Re: [sqlalchemy] bug in reflection.py sqla 0.7.3

2011-12-01 Thread Michael Bayer
thats fixed in r2b66b5abf755, will be in 0.7.4 or you can get the tip off the download page. On Dec 1, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Michael Bayer wrote: > nevermind, I need to randomize that list in order to trigger it > > > On Dec 1, 2011, at 1:42 PM, Michael Bayer wrote: > >> I'm not able to repro

Re: [sqlalchemy] bug in reflection.py sqla 0.7.3

2011-12-01 Thread Michael Bayer
nevermind, I need to randomize that list in order to trigger it On Dec 1, 2011, at 1:42 PM, Michael Bayer wrote: > I'm not able to reproduce that, and also this code should likely be replaced > by our existing topological sort code. Can you provide a succinct > reproducing example ? > > > O

Re: [sqlalchemy] bug in reflection.py sqla 0.7.3

2011-12-01 Thread Michael Bayer
I'm not able to reproduce that, and also this code should likely be replaced by our existing topological sort code. Can you provide a succinct reproducing example ? On Dec 1, 2011, at 2:22 AM, Robert Forkel wrote: > Hi, > trying to use Inspector.get_table_names with order_by='foreign_key' > c

[sqlalchemy] bug in reflection.py sqla 0.7.3

2011-11-30 Thread Robert Forkel
Hi, trying to use Inspector.get_table_names with order_by='foreign_key' causes the following exception: Traceback (most recent call last): File "db_inspector.py", line 20, in for table in insp.get_table_names(schema=schema, order_by='foreign_key'): File "lib/python2.6/site-packages/sqlalc