On Mar 6, 2012, at 1:37 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
On 02/03/2012 15:59, Michael Bayer wrote:
the other recipe is the windowed range query which I normally use for this
at http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/wiki/UsageRecipes/WindowedRangeQuery,
So, this would be the way to go for Microsoft SQL
On 02/03/2012 15:59, Michael Bayer wrote:
the other recipe is the windowed range query which I normally use for this at
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/wiki/UsageRecipes/WindowedRangeQuery,
So, this would be the way to go for Microsoft SQL Server?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content
Hi All,
I need to do a query that, in its simplest form, would be:
for row in session.query(Message.body).order_by(Message.session_num):
...do read-only stuff with row and then discard...
However, as that query will return roughly 20-40 million rows per time,
I'm guessing the above may not
On Mar 2, 2012, at 4:21 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
I need to do a query that, in its simplest form, would be:
for row in session.query(Message.body).order_by(Message.session_num):
...do read-only stuff with row and then discard...
However, as that query will return roughly
