On 09/13/2010 05:49 PM, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Sep 13, 2010, at 11:16 AM, alex bodnaru wrote:
hope my approach isn't too simplist, but onetomany is usually implemented in
rdbms by an manytoone column or a few of them, with or without ri clauses:
thus,
a foreign key or an index.
On Sep 12, 2010, at 11:02 PM, alex bodnaru wrote:
thanks a lot michael.
indeed it works, but it seems counter-intuitive a little since passive_*
should
in my opinion be on the side of the on * cascade it describes.
anyway, it's great, and hope to make it work with elixir too.
If you said
On 09/13/2010 08:32 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Sep 12, 2010, at 11:02 PM, alex bodnaru wrote:
thanks a lot michael.
indeed it works, but it seems counter-intuitive a little since passive_*
should
in my opinion be on the side of the on * cascade it describes.
anyway, it's great, and hope
On Sep 13, 2010, at 11:16 AM, alex bodnaru wrote:
hope my approach isn't too simplist, but onetomany is usually implemented in
rdbms by an manytoone column or a few of them, with or without ri clauses:
thus,
a foreign key or an index.
conversely, a manytoone relation has an implicit
cant speak for Elixir, but your passive_deletes is on the wrong side in your
declarative example.
The correlations between classical and declarative relationship patterns are
now individually contrasted at
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/orm/relationships.html#basic-relational-patterns
.
On
On 09/12/2010 04:27 PM, Michael Bayer wrote:
cant speak for Elixir, but your passive_deletes is on the wrong side in
your declarative example.
The correlations between classical and declarative relationship patterns are
now individually contrasted at
On 09/12/2010 04:27 PM, Michael Bayer wrote:
cant speak for Elixir, but your passive_deletes is on the wrong side in
your declarative example.
The correlations between classical and declarative relationship patterns are
now individually contrasted at
On 09/11/2010 04:31 AM, alex wrote:
On 09/10/2010 05:41 PM, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Sep 10, 2010, at 4:13 AM, alex wrote:
hello friends,
as sqlite has recently introduced support for on delete/update cascade,
i'd like to implement the passive_* functionality for this driver too.
please
hello friends,
as sqlite has recently introduced support for on delete/update cascade,
i'd like to implement the passive_* functionality for this driver too.
please give me a hint where to start.
best regards,
alex
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Sep 10, 2010, at 4:13 AM, alex wrote:
hello friends,
as sqlite has recently introduced support for on delete/update cascade,
i'd like to implement the passive_* functionality for this driver too.
please give me a hint where to start.
passive_delete and passive_update are database
10 matches
Mail list logo
