On 5/19/15 8:57 AM, Richard Gerd Kuesters wrote:
hi!
this may be a weird question, but is there a way i can restrict the
number of children in a relationship? not by limit ...
how is that different? Anytime in SQL you want to get only the first N
of M, LIMIT or its equivalents must be
thanks Mike!
when i stated about the limit, it was because it must not be taken as a
parameter for any query, which select * from blah and select * from
bla limit N should be return the same exactly number of rows, including
where filters and so on. it is something like a physical rule, where
On 5/19/15 10:54 AM, Richard Gerd Kuesters wrote:
thanks Mike!
when i stated about the limit, it was because it must not be taken as
a parameter for any query, which select * from blah and select *
from bla limit N should be return the same exactly number of rows,
including where filters
bingo! thanks Simon. that's exactly the question :)
well, the checks on the cube are already there (they must have a value
higher then 0 to have a volume), but i must not increment the cube
children more then it's maximum capacity. i'm considering an event
listener as well, but i'm wondering
hi!
this may be a weird question, but is there a way i can restrict the
number of children in a relationship? not by limit ...
scenario: i have a one to many rel, where the parent have 3 values (row,
column, depth) that creates a max child count of row * column * depth
(yes, like the 3d
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Mike Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
On 5/19/15 10:54 AM, Richard Gerd Kuesters wrote:
thanks Mike!
when i stated about the limit, it was because it must not be taken as a
parameter for any query, which select * from blah and select * from bla
limit