On 12/09/2015 02:07 AM, Юрий Пайков wrote:
>
> Ok, here is the test
> code https://gist.github.com/ojomio/941d03b728a88d93d010
> Apart from reproducing the (seeming) problem, it prints out
> "PASSIVE_NO_RESULT"(yes, you were right about the name) which is /in/
> committed_state
great, thanks.
Thank you for the detailed explanation of what happens. Now I understand.
Shame on me I hadn't noticed this in the docs...
Everything which deals with expiration and object state business is always
a bit over my head...
You said it mostly the flush() business and is_modified() indeed looks like
On 12/09/2015 01:18 PM, Юрий Пайков wrote:
> Thank you for the detailed explanation of what happens. Now I
> understand. Shame on me I hadn't noticed this in the docs...
> Everything which deals with expiration and object state business is
> always a bit over my head...
>
> You said it mostly
I run a program which creates, fills and merges to DB a list of mapped
objects. I need to know if a merge created a new instance in a database or
if it updated previously existing one or if it did noop. When I know the
instance is persistent, my goal is to figure out if it's going to be
On 12/08/2015 07:41 AM, Юрий Пайков wrote:
> I run a program which creates, fills and merges to DB a list of mapped
> objects. I need to know if a merge created a new instance in a database
> or if it updated previously existing one or if it did noop. When I know
> the instance is persistent, my
Ok, here is the test
code https://gist.github.com/ojomio/941d03b728a88d93d010
Apart from reproducing the (seeming) problem, it prints out
"PASSIVE_NO_RESULT"(yes, you were right about the name) which is *in*
committed_state
вторник, 8 декабря 2015 г., 19:44:16 UTC+5 пользователь Michael Bayer
