meron
Sent: Monday, 16 January 2012 1:41 PM
To: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [sqlalchemy] Re: Initialize model by its primary key.
Hmm, it's kind of hard to say whether the code you just posted is OK or not,
without knowing what those 2 classes represent. It kind of looks to me
> From: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com [mailto:sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Jackson, Cameron
> Sent: Monday, 16 January 2012 12:45 PM
> To: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: [sqlalchemy] Re: Initialize model by its primary key.
>
> You are correct that a
On Jan 15, 2012, at 9:07 PM, gpitel wrote:
> What you are saying makes perfect sense. Thank you for showing me the
> light. The code below incorporates what I think you were saying and
> allows me to still test it easily. Thanks again. A+++ for the
> SQLAlchemy community!!!
A+++ for Cameron
@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [sqlalchemy] Re: Initialize model by its primary key.
You are correct that an object should initialise itself, but don't take that to
mean that Test0 should be responsible for every use case where a Test0 is going
to be created. If you need some logic that says
You are correct that an object should initialise itself, but don't take that to
mean that Test0 should be responsible for every use case where a Test0 is going
to be created. If you need some logic that says, for example, 'If a Test0
already exists with id x, then return it, otherwise create a n
