I've tested the 0.7 & 0.8 snapshots, and both work fine now. Thanks! From: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com [mailto:sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Bayer Sent: 03 October 2012 17:20 To: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [sqlalchemy] SQLite rollback() fails
On Oct 3, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Michael Bayer wrote: Catching both of these is easy enough and a patch is added to #2583: http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/2583 The SQLite case you describe isn't exactly like either of these; if the object were flushed by the session and received the same PK, that case is already handled since the object would be in ._new. So my only guess is that, that's not the trigger of the issue. So at the very least you need to try that patch and see if it clears things up. Assuming that's the fix, I don't know that there's a clean way to patch this in, except for patching your install or monkeypatching a new Session class in. I should have it committed in both 0.7/0.8 within 30, unless I hit some snags in the tests. OK those are in tip for default + 0.7, so you can get those fixes now from the snapshot releases. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com<mailto:sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com>. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTICE: Morgan Stanley is not acting as a municipal advisor and the opinions or views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not constitute, advice within the meaning of Section 975 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. If you have received this communication in error, please destroy all electronic and paper copies and notify the sender immediately. Mistransmission is not intended to waive confidentiality or privilege. Morgan Stanley reserves the right, to the extent permitted under applicable law, to monitor electronic communications. This message is subject to terms available at the following link: http://www.morganstanley.com/disclaimers. If you cannot access these links, please notify us by reply message and we will send the contents to you. By messaging with Morgan Stanley you consent to the foregoing. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
