On Thursday, March 7, 2013 2:16:54 PM UTC-5, Michael Bayer wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 7, 2013, at 2:12 PM, Jason >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, March 7, 2013 1:40:46 PM UTC-5, Michael Bayer wrote:
>>
>> Can you pass along more specifics here? I don't see where this named
>> tuple is being created.
On Mar 7, 2013, at 2:12 PM, Jason wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, March 7, 2013 1:40:46 PM UTC-5, Michael Bayer wrote:
> Can you pass along more specifics here? I don't see where this named tuple
> is being created. It's true that the ARRAY type by default doesn't know how
> deep it should be un
On Thursday, March 7, 2013 1:40:46 PM UTC-5, Michael Bayer wrote:
>
> Can you pass along more specifics here? I don't see where this named
> tuple is being created. It's true that the ARRAY type by default doesn't
> know how deep it should be unwrapping arrays, if you pass the "dimensions"
>
Can you pass along more specifics here? I don't see where this named tuple is
being created. It's true that the ARRAY type by default doesn't know how deep
it should be unwrapping arrays, if you pass the "dimensions" argument then it
will be fixed. But it's not clear why you didn't see this
