Is there an official minimum python version SA wants to support? Should patches avoid use of decorators, generator expressions, and other 2.4-specific code?This has probably been answered already, in which case, I plead suckiness of the SF search engine. :)
-- Jonathan Ellishttp://spyced.blogspot.
Ah, never thought of the str() trickthanks!
This is a bit of an oddball case, and easy to work around, certainly not worth blocking for.
SA is progressing and stabilizing nicely. I'm happy with the pace of things and quality of the code. After slinging Javscript all day, it's a joy to make
you know I am looking thru the docs as well as the unit tests and I am surprised that I dont seem to have ever even completed this functionality, i.e. being able to stick a SELECT inside the column clause of another select. which is very strange since I was pretty sure I hit all these in at least
No, they're supposed to be subqueries -- correlated subqueries. That maybe got lost in simplifying and pasting the code.
Note that the problem isn't the inclusion of the subqueries in the column clause -- that's correct.
It's the repetition of those subqueries in the FROM clause that's the issue
youre sticking two select() objects in your column clause, inside the functionsso they come out as SELECT statements in your column clause, i.e. subqueries.what SQL are you looking to produce ? maybe this ?q = db.sql.select([L.c.id, L.c.nm, Z.c.zipcode, db.sql.func.latlondist(Z.c.latitude, Z.
SA seems intent on adding subqueries used in DB functions to the FROM list of a query:
Z = S.Table('zipcodes', dbeng,
S.Column('zipcode', S.VARCHAR(5), nullable=False,
primary_key=True),
S.Column('city', S.VARCHAR(30), nu
Hi guys --
Just svn'ed up the latest source and I noticed a return to the
extremely long time for reflection, on the order of around 63 seconds
for twenty odd tables, with a fair number of foreign keys and
such. The backend is a PostgreSQL 8.1 server running on my WinXP workstation.
Looking
7 matches
Mail list logo
