Michael Bayer wrote:
to me, the method means, "this
is an object I loaded from some other Session and now I want it to be
in this Session", thats why I like "import"...it implies youre "taking
it from somewhere else and putting it here".
adopt?
Robert
-
i would think you didnt like add() but liked import(). what does the
name "update()" mean ? to me that means you want to issue an UPDATE
statement. but SA will not issue any UPDATE statements unless the
object is modified in some way. then you might say delete() on it
and then its not g
On 4/20/06, Daniel Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, I wasn't really suggesting that they be changed (although I don't like
> "import_").
I agree with you on this particular bikeshed. PEP8, I believe, does
mention that format, but it still seems ugly.
Kevin
Michael Bayer wrote:
hey Dan -
just FYI, the current 0.2 Session implementation regarding this is
looking like the following (hibernate's "save" is "add", hibernate's
"update" is "import_". both of which at the moment seem to be clearer
names to me, but maybe you see it differently...possib
Here's how I've addressed the same problem on a per-transaction basis,
based on some ideas of Valentino Volonghi (aka Dialtone):
http://foss.eepatents.com/pNetworkX/browser/trunk/pnetworkx/database.py
Note particularly the "transact" function, which is used as a decorator.
Here's a usage example
All,
Here is the pattern I have adopted for putting long-running queries
into a thread, to avoid blocking the entire application. I'm using
twisted's deferToThread().
def runInThread(fun, *args, **kwargs):
opts = schema.default_engine.engine.opts
dbname = schema.default_engine.engine.n
Michael Bayer zzzcomputing.com> writes:
> raul -
>
> nice catch ! luckily, the natural dependency operations already
> support what you are trying to do, i just had to make some slight
> rearrangements in the properties module. added a distilled and
> asserted version of your test to the
looks like youre defining the same Table object twice. looking at
the activemapper unit test i dont see the Person class being created
twice so perhaps something in activemapper itself is calling Table
('person') a second time...id say throw some print statements in.
On Apr 20, 2006, at 5
All,
I have made an update to the ActiveMapper code based on changes by
Gabriel Jacobo (thanks Gabriel!). I have been able to verify the
changes in many cases, but I can't seem to get the ActiveMapper unit
tests running again. I have already committed the changes that
Gabriel sent me be
On Apr 20, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Vasily Sulatskov wrote:
- may I suggest, that since this issue is decided completely within
the source code for types.String, that various implementations of
String, corresponding to different user preferences with regards to
Unicode treatment, be provided as mods w
hey Dan -
just FYI, the current 0.2 Session implementation regarding this is
looking like the following (hibernate's "save" is "add", hibernate's
"update" is "import_". both of which at the moment seem to be
clearer names to me, but maybe you see it differently...possibly not
consistent
a couple of things:
- where's the patch ? I thought i had put it in but it seems not.
lets put in a Trac ticket for it.
- may I suggest, that since this issue is decided completely within
the source code for types.String, that various implementations of
String, corresponding to differen
Hello Qvx,
> As for the autoload I'm not sure what to do. If *I* had to do it I would
> return Unicode columns everywhere. More flexible solution would, I guess,
> alow developer to intervene in some way (via kw param).
I did some testing on sqlalchemy autoload feature and it seems that
sqlalchem
The PSF is a sponsoring organization for Google's Summer of Code. I
personally am interested in seeing some kind of schema migration tool
support and SQLObject compatibility for SQLAlchemy (probably built on
ActiveMapper). Anyone else interested in those? Anyone want to mentor?
Kevin
--
Kevin Dan
14 matches
Mail list logo
