yah I am looking for 2.3 compatiblity in core modules. if you have a
special-use extension, its not as crucial. but if you specify
decorators etc., its good to also work out how that decorator can be
applied in a 2.3 style.
On Mar 13, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Luís Bruno wrote:
Jonathan Ellis w
Jonathan Ellis wrote:
Should patches avoid use of decorators, generator expressions, and
other 2.4-specific code?
Yeah, I believe I've seen that on the list; can't point you to it,
though: my search-juju isn't working too.
I know no one asked my opinion, but I'd submit 2.3 code. Titus Brown'
Is there an official minimum python version SA wants to support? Should patches avoid use of decorators, generator expressions, and other 2.4-specific code?This has probably been answered already, in which case, I plead suckiness of the SF search engine. :)
-- Jonathan Ellishttp://spyced.blogspot.
i was hoping to have at least a nod of compatibility to python 2.3,
as its still the standard install on a lot of systems, at least with
regards to the core SA functionality being available. if you are
contributing an extension module that is optional to the library's
functioning, that is
What's the python version required for SQLAlchemy itself?
If I provide patches/refactorings, can I assume python 2.4?
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
5 matches
Mail list logo
