On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:21:50AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] scratched on the
wall:
> I use it built in on iPhone -- oops. Can't talk about iPhone.
Yes, you can. On Oct. 1st Apple modified the SDK Agreement,
essentially removing the developer NDA. Some aspects (i.e.
pre-release software)
In a message dated 10/30/08 9:05:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> If you have an official devkit, or care to grab a copy of the
> I-don't-know-if-it's-legal DevKit Pro, you can try it out yourself and let
> us know how it works.
>
I have the DevKit and all the goodies and am able to make the
> Has anyone used SQLite on the NintendoDS? Can it fit? Arm7 and ARM9 and
> a
> cartridge like an SD card. The database can be static in FLASH. But the
> rest?
>
> -- Charlie Springer
>
[Sherief N. Farouk]
If you have an official devkit, or care to grab a copy of the
I-don't-know-if-it's-legal
Unless I did something wrong, I did observe constant time inserts in
Berkeley DB. Is it possible that I had constant time inserts into a btree
as my db grew because of the nature of my data? I was inserting records in
order of how they would be sorted by index. In other words, every inserted
rec
On Oct 29, 2008, at 4:59 AM, Julian Bui wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> First off, I'm a database and sqlite newbie. I'm inserting many many
> records and indexing over one of the double attributes. I am seeing
> my insert times slowly degrade as the database grows in size until
> it's unacceptable -
Has anyone used SQLite on the NintendoDS? Can it fit? Arm7 and ARM9 and a
cartridge like an SD card. The database can be static in FLASH. But the rest?
-- Charlie Springer
**
Plan your next getaway with AOL Travel.
Check out Today's Hot 5 Travel Deals!
(http://pr.atwola.com/promo
Leandro Ribeiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hello Guys.
>
> I have a problem with running SQLite.
> I am running linux 2.6.17 on *ARM* and basically problem is that my
> application
> is crushing on *sqlite3_open*() function while the sqlite3 command
> shell is
> running without problems.
Mihai Limbasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hello, Aaron.
>
> Have you tried Mr. Griggs' solution yet? Please be aware that posting
> the same question for the *third* time in a row will not make it any
> more visible, but will dramatically increase the chance that people will
> become ann
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Shane Harrelson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The sizes that I mentioned (315KB vs 205KB) are for the final .dll and
That should read (235KB and 205KB).
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.
The sizes that I mentioned (315KB vs 205KB) are for the final .dll and
.so size. You might try linking your object files into a lib to see
how that affects size. You could also try running the "strip"
command on the object files to ensure all the debugging symbols are
removed.
Any OMIT options
Hello,
I'm having two independent processes that accessing SQLite db simultaneously.
Process A writes db in transaction and Process B reads the same db
simultaneously. If Process B reads db and timeout for Process A expires, SQLite
returns code 10 (disk I/O error) instead of 5 (sqlite busy).
I
Just one more clarification:
I am measuring the size of the produced .o object file, that is, before
linking. That is why I remove -ffunction-sections, but of course, with -ffs
would probably produce a smaller binary after linking. The reason is that it is
not clear which microcontroller I'll b
First a note: I removed -ffunction-sections from the compiler options, and it
is now better, but not good enough (365KB). It was an options the AVR IDE
defaulted to, that is why I not noticed it. OMIT_DISKIO is also NOT defined. I
am using SQLite version 3.6.4. OTHER_OS=1 and THREADSAFE=0.
At
Roger Binns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> MikeW wrote:
> > Having looked at the source code, looks like the best way to do this
> > /would/ be to add another (!) numerical parameter to sqlite3ErrorMsg()
indicating
> > the extended error code that corresponds with the message.
>
> http://www.
Ah, thanks. I think I'll wait for the next stable release and go to
that; in the meantime I'll use the WHERE 1 trick. Thanks!
-david
Dan wrote:
> On Oct 30, 2008, at 3:10 PM, David Barrett wrote:
>
>> Ok, getting close: now I test for changes in sqlite3_total_changes()
>> and
>> PRAGMA sche
On Oct 30, 2008, at 3:10 PM, David Barrett wrote:
> Ok, getting close: now I test for changes in sqlite3_total_changes()
> and
> PRAGMA schema_version and that works, except for one case:
>
> DELETE FROM table;
>
> I see in the docs for sqlite_total_changes() that I can solve this
> by
Ok, getting close: now I test for changes in sqlite3_total_changes() and
PRAGMA schema_version and that works, except for one case:
DELETE FROM table;
I see in the docs for sqlite_total_changes() that I can solve this by doing:
DELETE FROM table WHERE 1;
Is there any other way
17 matches
Mail list logo