download url like this
http://www.sqlite.org/sqlite-2_x_xx.zip
exam:http://www.sqlite.org/sqlite-2_8_17.zip
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Sqlite-2-tp22944102p25199847.html
Sent from the SQLite mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 28 Aug 2009, at 9:56pm, Beau Wilkinson wrote:
>> I want a query language that non-techies can use easily, but also
>> supports arbitrarily complex queries. Does such a language exist?
>
> I remember reading once, in an old book about RDBMS, that SQL was
> intended to be something that
> I want a query language that non-techies can use easily, but also
> supports arbitrarily complex queries. Does such a language exist?
I remember reading once, in an old book about RDBMS, that SQL was intended to
be something that non-technical decision-maker types could learn in a few
hours.
Thank's Swithun
but I still have trouble.
Ok, I find out how to register functions with PDO_Sqlite extensions. Just in
case someone is in the same situation, the way to do it is this:
$dbh = new PDO('sqlite:/whatever.sqlite');
$dbh->sqliteCreateFunction('Test','Test');
But I still have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anders Moe wrote:
> I think Sqlite is great, but I'm surprised referential integrity contraints
> have not been implemented a long time ago. Does anyone know if this is
> anywhere on the roadmap ?
Lookup the genfkey command in the shell.
Roger
Yes, you are right (as always).
Time with SQLITE_THREADSAFE=0 is about 4.33 seconds now.
Thanks a lot.
--
Marco Bambini
http://www.sqlabs.com
http://www.creolabs.com/payshield/
On Aug 28, 2009, at 5:23 PM, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> On Aug 28, 2009, at 11:17 AM, Mike Eggleston wrote:
>
>>
On Aug 28, 2009, at 11:17 AM, Mike Eggleston wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Marco Bambini might have said:
>>
>> Version 3.4.2 takes about 5.06 seconds (average value) while version
>> 3.6.17 takes about 7.28 seconds (average value).
>> Could be a slowdown in the library for the complexity added
Library is statically linked into the final app and the db is newly
created...
--
Marco Bambini
http://www.sqlabs.com
http://www.creolabs.com/payshield/
On Aug 28, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Mike Eggleston wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Marco Bambini might have said:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> today I made
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Marco Bambini might have said:
> Hello,
>
> today I made some test on a project I wrote some years ago.
> I upgraded sqlite library from version 3.4.2 to version 3.6.17.
> What I am really unable to understand is the time difference required
> to perform the same query
Hi all
I think Sqlite is great, but I'm surprised referential integrity contraints
have not been implemented a long time ago. Does anyone know if this is
anywhere on the roadmap ?
Best regards,
Anders
___
sqlite-users mailing list
Can I ask you why do you need to allocate memsys5 memory pool in the
first place? Why don't you use standard mallocs? Or even your own
allocator?
I just have a feeling that you're pursuing some goals very specific to
your application and this kind of functionality is not necessary to
anybody else.
Hello,
today I made some test on a project I wrote some years ago.
I upgraded sqlite library from version 3.4.2 to version 3.6.17.
What I am really unable to understand is the time difference required
to perform the same query using the exact same algorithm by the two
libraries.
SELECT *
Hello
AR if I run this php script
AR
AR *$dbh = new PDO('sqlite:/var/www/test.sqlite');
AR $sql="INSERT INTO Test ( Nombre , IP , MAC , Descripcion_Modulo ) VALUES (
AR '2221' , '2121' , '1212' , '1212' ) ";
AR $modulo=$dbh->query($sql);
AR print_r($dbh->errorInfo()); *
AR
AR from outside
Use old.TypeID==1 if you want the trigger to be fired when TypeID WAS 1
before the update, or new.TypeID==1 if you want the trigger to be fired when
TypeID is updated to 1.
Hope this help...
2009/8/28 Dennis Volodomanov
> Hello all,
>
> Is it possible to create such an
Hi everybody,
I'm having a problem when I invoke a function developed in php from a
trigger.
I've been using SQLIteManager to develop and test my functions and
everything work's perfect.
I've created this function:
*INSERT INTO user_function ( funct_name , funct_type , funct_code ,
Does any one know of a way to know which columns are to be used in a virtual
table implementation for a particular query? At the xFilter() point the engine
essentially knows what it is going to do and what columns it will use, but that
information does not seem to be exposed anywhere. Certainly
Hello all,
Is it possible to create such an AFTER INSERT trigger that updates certain
fields in a table based on the actual data being inserted?
Let's say:
CREATE TABLE abc(TypeID INTEGER)
CREATE TABLE abcCount(TypeCountA, TypeCountB)
CREATE TRIGGER CountTypeA AFTER INSERT ON abc /* when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
chean xu wrote:
> i got a loop call of mallopt() when run sqlite_open(),
> anybody can help me?
Start here:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Roger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using
> create trigger CountType after insert on abc
> begin
> update abcCount set
> TypeCountA = TypeCountA + (new.TypeID = 1),
> TypeCountB = TypeCountB + (new.TypeID = 2);
> end;
Thank you - that looks great!
Dennis
___
19 matches
Mail list logo