Hello,
I want to use System.Data.SQLite by invoking it via
DbProviderFactories.GetFactory(providerName). If I have an old version
installed on my machine I always get that instead of the one inside the
referenced NuGet package. If uninstall it, the call fails because it cannot be
found.
I fou
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
> Pavel Ivanov wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
>>> On 9/13/2012 4:39 PM, Petite Abeille wrote:
On Sep 13, 2012, at 10:24 PM, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
>> In other words, a select should o
Pavel Ivanov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
>> On 9/13/2012 4:39 PM, Petite Abeille wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 13, 2012, at 10:24 PM, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
>>>
> In other words, a select should only ever see what existed at the
> beginning of the query,
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
> On 9/13/2012 4:39 PM, Petite Abeille wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sep 13, 2012, at 10:24 PM, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
>>
In other words, a select should only ever see what existed at the
beginning of the query, and that is that.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ag
ArbolOne wrote:
> I would like to know how does one tell SQLite3 to
> read the subsequent rows using the C/C++ API.
One calls sqlite3_step whenever one wishes to advance to the next row.
> void mySQLite3::setStmt(const Glib::ustring& s) {
> SQLStatement = s;
> if (mystmt == NULL) { rc = sqlite3_
I have been able to write to the databaserepeatedly; several records have
been added to it in a table named ‘name’ tolook like this:
Id - tile - fname - mname - lname
100 - Mr - Me - Who - Papá
101 - Mrs - She - What - Mamá
102 - Mr - He - Who - Papá
I am now trying to read all the informationfrom
On 13/09/12 23:02, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
Eleytherios Stamatogiannakis wrote:
It seems to me that using a covering index scan would always be faster
in both cases (fewer disk page reads).
Yes, if the index has fewer columns than the table.
In my experience, the most frequent case is for an
On 13 Sep 2012, at 11:36pm, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
>> "statement-level read consistency. This guarantees that all the data
>> returned by a single query comes from a single point in time—the time that
>> the query began. Therefore, a query never sees dirty data or any of the
>> changes made by
On 9/13/2012 4:39 PM, Petite Abeille wrote:
On Sep 13, 2012, at 10:24 PM, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
In other words, a select should only ever see what existed at the beginning of
the query, and that is that.
Again, the concept of isolation level applies to transactions, not to
individual quer
On 13 Sep 2012, at 10:39pm, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Links to the version 3 documentation, on the other hand, are plastered all
> over the homepage (http://www.sqlite.org), getting high-value placement
> right there under "Common Links" on the right-hand side, and featured on
> the "About" page (ht
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Simon Slavin wrote:
> I'm looking for an in-depth discussion of what each of the error codes
> mean, like the one on the page
>
> http://www.sqlite.org/c_interface.html
>
> which appears from its position to be part of the current, up-to-date
> documentation for S
I'm looking for an in-depth discussion of what each of the error codes mean,
like the one on the page
http://www.sqlite.org/c_interface.html
which appears from its position to be part of the current, up-to-date
documentation for SQLite. However, that page has the title
"The C language interfa
On 13 Sep 2012, at 8:54pm, Marcus Ilgner wrote:
> Ok, I was under the impression that sqlite3_step would always return
> the same error code as in the db.
There's no good way to guess what sqlite3_step() will return, especially if you
called it after ignoring another error result code from ano
On Sep 13, 2012, at 10:24 PM, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
>> In other words, a select should only ever see what existed at the beginning
>> of the query, and that is that.
>
> Again, the concept of isolation level applies to transactions, not to
> individual queries.
Let me rephrase that, by parap
On 9/13/2012 4:14 PM, Petite Abeille wrote:
On Sep 13, 2012, at 9:30 PM, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
If records are added by the same transaction that runs the SELECT statements,
then they may or may not be observed (imagine for example that the statement
has an ORDER BY clause, and a new row is i
On Sep 13, 2012, at 9:30 PM, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
> If records are added by the same transaction that runs the SELECT statements,
> then they may or may not be observed (imagine for example that the statement
> has an ORDER BY clause, and a new row is inserted that comes before the row
> tha
Eleytherios Stamatogiannakis wrote:
> create table t (c1,c2, c3, c4);
> create index idxtc1 on t(c1);
>
> explain query plan select c1 from t;
> SCAN TABLE t (~100 rows)
>
> explain query plan select c1 from t order by c1;
> SCAN TABLE t USING COVERING INDEX idxtc1 (~100 rows)
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13.09.2012 17:50, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
> Marcus Ilgner wrote:
>>
>> I'm one of the authors of the SQLite-WinRT component for Windows
>> 8.
>
> Cool, the one on CodePlex?
>
Oh, sorry, I forgot to include the link [1]. The one at Codeplex is
more
If you use rowid correctly (always incrementing rowid by using AUTOINCREMENT)
you can always query records > lastrowid. That's probably easier.
http://www.sqlite.org/autoinc.html
So something like:
startrowid = 0;
lastrowid = select max(rowid) from mytable;
select * from mytable where rowid >=
On 9/13/2012 3:20 PM, Paul Vercellotti wrote:
I'm wondering if there's a way to get "incremental" results to a query after
it's started, that includes new records added after the query began?
If records are added by the same transaction that runs the SELECT
statements, then they may or may no
Hi there,
I'm wondering if there's a way to get "incremental" results to a query after
it's started, that includes new records added after the query began?
That is, we've got a UI view that's showing query results, while a background
task is adding records to the database, some of which may m
Marcus Ilgner wrote:
>
> I'm one of the authors of the SQLite-WinRT component for Windows 8.
>
Cool, the one on CodePlex?
>
> Regarding this release, can you tell me what configuration was used to
> compile it?
>
The default compilation options from the MSVC makefile were used, along
with th
2012/9/12 Simon Slavin
>
> On 12 Sep 2012, at 8:00pm, Dmitry Baryshev wrote:
>
> > Actually this is a dynamically loaded plugin, so compiler won't strip
> > unused functions. I cannot change this behaviour. That's why I'm asking
> > about SQLITE_* directives.
>
> Ah. In that case you want secti
Hello,
During testing of our implementation of SQLite Virtual Table mechanism we've
encountered an unexpected behavior.
For the following virtual table structure:
create table X(ID int, RL real)
This query returns all the records in the correct descending order by RL
field:
Query 1:
select * fr
Hello list,
I'm one of the authors of the SQLite-WinRT component for Windows 8. We
recently adapted it to use the official Windows 8 compatible release
through NuGet. Thank you for providing a current version of SQLite through
this channel!
Regarding this release, can you tell me what configuratio
Hey Guys,
I didn't a ticket for this one anywhere, so forgive me if it's already been
reported.
Trying to use the compile option SQLITE_RTREE_INT_ONLY with SQLITE_ENABLE_RTREE
and sqlite3_compileoption_used() won't acknowledge that it's set. I did a
quick check in the source and it seems li
Hello,
can you please send me your corrupted database files? (or put somewhere where I
can download them).
I am finishing a new sqlite utility and I would like to test it with a lot of
different databases.
Thanks a lot!
--
Marco Bambini
http://www.sqlabs.com
_
27 matches
Mail list logo