On 2 Feb 2014, at 1:09am, Keith Medcalf wrote:
> No access method (yet invented) in any product (yet invented) can use more
> than a single traversal path through a collection of data at any given time
> during a single traversal operation.
Yeah, that's why I asked for a
As I recall, I recorded the source file and line number location of the
query, the query and its plan. No execution time, because the time each
query ran would have been heavily influenced by the amount of time the
caller used in processing each row. It could have been done, but the query
plan was
>> Would be interesting to see
>> when and where that single index comes into play when multiple indexes
>> are
>> defined.
>MS SQL allows for many sorts of indexes, and SQLite has only one. MS SQL
>has a Tuning Wizard, which will recommend indexes to create or drop, but
>SQLite has a better
Eric Schultz wrote:
>
> One thing I did notice when debugging is that on these copied assemblies,
> the Assembly.CodeBase property has the original location of the Assembly
> before running.
>
I've added code to the native library pre-loader to attempt to handle using
the code base of the
On 1 Feb 2014, at 4:21pm, Stephen Chrzanowski wrote:
> What was the raw results of some of the queries? Obviously query and
> explain, but did you also tag in time deltas pre and post queries?
>
> I'll have to read up more on EXPLAIN. I'm aware of how indexes work as
>
On 2/1/2014 12:26 PM, Klaas V wrote:
|Igor Tandetnik wrote:
| On 1/30/2014 7:20 PM, James K. Lowden wrote:
|or define a constraint
|
| colname boolean check (colname in ('Y', 'N'))
|
|Of course you can use 0 and 1, but there's no technical advantage
|There is a tiny
|Igor Tandetnik wrote:
| On 1/30/2014 7:20 PM, James K. Lowden wrote:
|or define a constraint
|
|colname boolean check (colname in ('Y', 'N'))
|
|Of course you can use 0 and 1, but there's no technical advantage
|There is a tiny advantage. Values 0 and 1 are special-cased in
What was the raw results of some of the queries? Obviously query and
explain, but did you also tag in time deltas pre and post queries?
I'll have to read up more on EXPLAIN. I'm aware of how indexes work as
well as where and when you need to put them in, but, when I had my SQL
training back on
jose isaias cabrera wrote:
> now this command is working perfectly:
>
> BEGIN; INSERT OR REPLACE INTO LSOpenProjects
>SELECT * FROM client.LSOpenProjects WHERE id IN
>(SELECT id from LSOpenProjects WHERE
>login != '20513925' AND
>id = client.LSOpenProjects.id
>
On 1 Feb 2014, at 3:53am, Labar, Ken wrote:
> Upgrading from 3.7.14.1 to 3.8.2 our previously sorted queries are no
> longer sorted.
> Testing this same database with the win7 binary 3.8.2 the query is correctly
> sorted.
Does your query include an ORDER BY clause ? If
On 1 Feb 2014, at 10:59am, RSmith wrote:
> The plural of Index is always "Indices", never "Indexes".
I started with 'indices' when posting to this list but I found that some of the
many foreign readers of this list apparently missed my meaning. It's easy for
someone
Hi Andreas,
Our application uses 3 Sqlite dbs and System.Data.Sqlite.dll (dropped by
installer). Functionality allows users to start a new instance of one of the
databases at run time. Hence we ship empty databases in a binary format,
created by one of our developers. The process of making
Heh, was waiting for someone to point that out :)
For the record, so does Oxford English dictionary - and on reconsideration, I should have been more clear. Indexes are very much
"allowed" these days a plural of Index when not used in a technical sense, but (and this is a big but), this is due
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:59 AM, RSmith wrote:
> I know this is a Database forum (as opposed to a language forum) but
> kindly allow me a quick interjection here since I have met this question
> many times, as posed by Scott in a forum question:
>
> On 2014/02/01 06:01, Scott
I know this is a Database forum (as opposed to a language forum) but kindly allow me a quick interjection here since I have met this
question many times, as posed by Scott in a forum question:
On 2014/02/01 06:01, Scott Robison wrote:
Exerpt: ...// *and* information that led to creation of
Anbrus wrote:
"what's the easiest way to generate a set of fixed number of rows like
VALUES does but in an order of your choice?"
Order them before with the command 'sort'
NAME
sort - sort lines of text files
SYNOPSIS
sort [OPTION]... [FILE]...
DESCRIPTION
Write sorted
16 matches
Mail list logo