Unique is implemented (as it must be) via a unique index.
CREATE TABLE ItemTable (
"key" text UNIQUE,
value blob NOT NULL
);
is equivalent to
CREATE TABLE ItemTable (
"key" text,
value blob NOT NULL
);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX sqlite_autoindex_ItemTable_1 on ItemTable (key);
You should be
Oh, I just realized that, although Igor’s suggestion “fixed” the problem, this
database definitely does not contain any indexes. The schema dump is simply
this…
CREATE TABLE ItemTable (
"key" text UNIQUE,
value blob NOT NULL
);
___
sqlite-users
On 2014 Jun 23, at 21:49, Igor Tandetnik wrote:
> One possibility: the query with WHERE clause attempts to use some index,
> while the query without doesn't.
>
> Try this query:
>
> SELECT * FROM itemTable WHERE +key = 'profileName' ;
>
> Note the + sign - this
On 6/23/2014 11:16 PM, Jerry Krinock wrote:
How can it be that adding a WHERE clause to a successful query causes ‘database
disk image is malformed’?
One possibility: the query with WHERE clause attempts to use some index,
while the query without doesn't. The data corruption happens to
How can it be that adding a WHERE clause to a successful query causes ‘database
disk image is malformed’?
My database has one table named `itemTable`. This table has two columns, `key`
which is type text and `value` which is type blob. There are two rows of data.
Their `value` blobs are
System.Data.SQLite version 1.0.93.0 (with SQLite 3.8.5) is now available on
the System.Data.SQLite website:
https://system.data.sqlite.org/
Further information about this release can be seen at
https://system.data.sqlite.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/news.wiki
Please post on the
> On 23 Jun 2014, at 4:10pm, Carlos Ferreira wrote:
>
> To access Blobs I use the direct access BLOB api from SQLite.
>
> However, what is the best way to update a record that contains a BLOB, and
> the only goals is to update the BLOB...
>
> The BLOB may shrink or
Hello,
One question.
To access Blobs I use the direct access BLOB api from SQLite.
However, what is the best way to update a record that contains a BLOB, and the
only goals is to update the BLOB...
The BLOB may shrink or increase...and that is the reason why I cannot use the
BLOB Write
Hello,
I found this reference in this link:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/676524/how-to-update-piecewise-a-blob-in-sqlite
"
This is not directly an answer to your question, but I have some experience
using random access for (big) blobs in SQLite, and I advise you against using
it, if
On 23 Jun 2014, at 11:17am, João Ramos wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Simon Slavin wrote:
>
>> Are you finalizing all these SQL commands (or using _exec() which amounts
>> to the same thing) ?
>
> Yes, I double checked and everything is
On 06/23/2014 05:48 AM, João Ramos wrote:
Here you go:
sqlite_stat1 (before - good planning)
HistoryEntry idx_HistoryEntry_uri_historyOrder 14992 44 5
HistoryEntry idx_HistoryEntry_historyOrder_historyTimestamp 14992 6 2
HistoryEntry idx_HistoryEntry_sourceType_sourceId 14992 2999 2
On 6/23/2014 5:43 AM, João Ramos wrote:
If multiple connections in shared cache mode are treated as a single "real"
connection, should I change the thread mode to Serialized?
What mode do you use now?
In any case, I doubt the thread mode has any bearing on the problem. The
scenario may occur
I am looking for a JAVA sqlite JDBC version 3.8.2 or later, for Linux
Rinat Hadashi
-
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s).
Here you go:
sqlite_stat1 (before - good planning)
HistoryEntry idx_HistoryEntry_uri_historyOrder 14992 44 5
HistoryEntry idx_HistoryEntry_historyOrder_historyTimestamp 14992 6 2
HistoryEntry idx_HistoryEntry_sourceType_sourceId 14992 2999 2
sqlite_stat1 (after - bad planning)
HistoryEntry
Hi,
.NET provider for sqlite should have public Instance property of
System.Data.SQLite.EF6.SQLiteProviderServices. Currently it is private.
In order to use it with Entity Framework code configuration.
Why this is a problem: http://stackoverflow.com/a/23237737/1107786
Thanks
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Simon Slavin wrote:
>
> On 22 Jun 2014, at 11:33pm, João Ramos wrote:
>
> > What happens is this: - a thread acquires the write DB connection - that
> > thread inserts a new row in a table and gets its id -
>
> Are
On 22 Jun 2014, at 11:33pm, João Ramos wrote:
> What happens is this: - a thread acquires the write DB connection - that
> thread inserts a new row in a table and gets its id -
Are you finalizing all these SQL commands (or using _exec() which amounts to
the same thing) ?
If multiple connections in shared cache mode are treated as a single "real"
connection, should I change the thread mode to Serialized? I tough this
"single" connection was in terms of page cache and would not have any
implications on how the connections are accessed (or not) concurrently,
Hello Richard,
thanks for the response and explanation.
adil
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 04:51:27PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Adil Hasan wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > I would like to add sqlite to a workflow. But, I cannot directly open the
> >
> Hi Experts,
> Did you try to compile and link your program with SQLite 3.8.5 with
> SQLITE_OMIT_WAL macro predefined? The compilation was successfully complete.
> But it would report a link error and complain it could not find the
> definition for unixGetpagesize function. I checked the
20 matches
Mail list logo