On 8/12/2015 4:27 AM, faizel williams wrote:
> I would like to create a link table in MS Access to a SQLite database. (Not
> using ODBC driver)
This can't possibly work. Access doesn't have any built-in knowledge of
SQLite - by what magic do you expect it to acquire the ability to
understand
Thanks to everyone for their contributions on this topic. I sent Dr. Hipp's
explanation to our legal team, and that was good enough for them. (This is a
US company, for those who wondered.)
I agree with Simon that if that explanation could be added to the comment in
random.c about the use of
I'm looking for a way to enable the shared-cache locking model in
system.data.sqlite. http://www.sqlite.org/sharedcache.html
I've looked through the source, and see there is a method in
UnsafeNativeMethods.cs that exposes this internally to the assembly, but
nothing that's public.
E.g.
> Actualy (maybe I wrong) but it leads to the same result in that case
> that using `reinterpret_cast`
>
> my problem about doing that is I don't know if it's safe...
> I mean, should I not get some mess with some char code
> (UTF8)?
>
You could create a new unsigned string type
typedef
On 12 Aug 2015, at 2:45pm, Brian Willner wrote:
> If you point out to your lawyers that SQLite is not doing anything that
> Apple's OS X is doing, you may get some traction as well.
Sorry to have to tell you that OS X /is/ registered for a US export licence,
mostly for its incorporation of
On 11 Aug 2015, at 3:00pm, Rob Willett wrote:
> I recall that it used to be that 40 bit RC4 was OK and I *think* that the bit
> length is now longer (128bit?) as it has been shown that 40 bit RC4 is as
> much use as a chocolate fireguard.
While it is allowable to export software
Dear all,
I have a (probably) very basic question regarding the usage of SQLite in an
multithreaded environment.
I use a compiled version of SQLite with SQLITE_THREADSAFE 0. Inside my
application exists one thread that is the exclusive user of the SQLite
interface. So from my point of view I am
thx Andy,
I'll keep that one close. When my program will be ready to perform some
tests with UTF8 encoding, I'll try your solution.
regards,
Nicolas
Le Wed, 12 Aug 2015 16:02:54 +,
Andy Ling a ?crit :
> > Actualy (maybe I wrong) but it leads to the same result in that case
> > that using
I tried your example.
'.schema' and '.fullschema' do show the problem you describe.
However, for me, '.dump' worked correctly placing the semicolon on a line by
itself right after the comment.
- Original Message -
From: "sqlite-mail"
To:
Sent: Wednesday,
Hi,
Actualy (maybe I wrong) but it leads to the same result in that case
that using `reinterpret_cast`
my problem about doing that is I don't know if it's safe...
I mean, should I not get some mess with some char code
(UTF8)?
I was expecting some people already did a such cast in the
past and
Hi,
I would like to create a link table in MS Access to a SQLite database. (Not
using ODBC driver)
The following code works in MS Access, but link table are in another MS
Acces database
Private Sub CreateAccessLinkTable(ByVal stmtHandle As Long, newTableName As
String)
Dim td As DAO.TableDef
"Several operating systems include arc4random, an API originating in OpenBSD
providing access to a random number generator originally based on RC4. In
OpenBSD 5.5, released in May 2014, arc4random was modified to use
ChaCha20.[11][12] As of January 2015, implementation of arc4random in
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Nicolas J?ger
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have some basic problem, but I didn't found the solution so far...
> maybe some people are using C++ and already deal with that problem :
>
> conversion from ?const unsigned char*? to non-scalar type ?std::string
>
> I got the
Just speaking as a cantankerous old cynic, I wonder how much of this is
being driven by a real concern and how much is being driven by someone with
an agenda to use a "more favored" product. I've been pushed even further in
the latter direction, in general, when I learned from a person who was
We tried already, still fail without correct recovery.
> From: slavins at bigfraud.org
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 03:43:59 +0100
> To: sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Fwd: Problem with SQLite in C++. DB is BUSY
> (Multithread)
>
>
> On 11 Aug 2015, at 2:28am,
On 08/12/2015 02:15 AM, Robert Weiss wrote:
> The bug seems to be repeatable. At least, it happened again today.
> I haven't used gdb in a long time. Here's my first crack at it; what else
> should I do?
> $ gdb sqliteGNU gdb (GDB) 7.8Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation,
> Inc.License
In Russia when I'm trying to visit sqlite.org site, I'm getting conection
timeout.
Also, sqlite.org doesn't pinged.
On 12 Aug 2015, at 12:18am, ??? ??? wrote:
> In Russia when I'm trying to visit sqlite.org site, I'm getting conection
> timeout.
>
> Also, sqlite.org doesn't pinged.
The web site is accessible from western Europe. And I can reach Moscow State
University so it doesn't seem to be
Hello !
Working with sqlite3 I noticed that sqlite3 ".dump", ".schema" and
".fullschema" outputs the contents of the field "sql" stored in
"sqlite_master" and if the sql statement ends with a comment the resulted
dump will be invalid see example:
=== valid sql statement stored on
Hello again !
After sending the first patch I also realized that when sqlite3 dumps
".schema" or ".fullschema" it doesn't surround the dump with a transaction
and that takes longer and makes the hard disk work hard. So I also surrounded
".schema" and ".fullschema" with a transaction with this
20 matches
Mail list logo