SELECT DISTINCT date_time_stamp FROM general ORDER BY date_time_stamp DESC
LIMIT 2
isn't it simply to use DISTINCT?
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Keith Christian
wrote:
> A table has a column of dates and times that look like this:
>
> 2015-10-02 07:55:02
>
> Try to write a fully standard compliant standard library without using any
of
> the reserved namespace!!!
This is the key point that has been missed so far. The C/C++ standards do
not provide a mechanism by which the supplier of a library can reserve or
sequester some range of identifiers, for
On 7/9/16 11:47 PM, J Decker wrote:
Okay if this should change, I would recommand a new standard for all
libraries; and since standards are so important maybe make them know about
it too...
do ... ORG_DOMAIN_APPLICATION_LIBRARY_MODULE_SOURCE_INCLUDED
where each piece becomes unqiqe so there's
On 2016/07/12 1:25 AM, Keith Christian wrote:
A table has a column of dates and times that look like this:
2015-10-02 07:55:02
2015-10-02 07:55:02
2015-10-02 10:00:03
2015-10-02 10:05:02
2015-10-02 10:10:02
Schema:
CREATE TABLE general ( id integer primary key autoincrement, server
text,
Simons + My answer;
select * from (SELECT date_time_stamp FROM general ORDER BY date_time_stamp
DESC LIMIT 2) a order by date_time_stamp;
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Simon Slavin wrote:
>
> On 12 Jul 2016, at 12:25am, Keith Christian
>
On 12 Jul 2016, at 12:25am, Keith Christian wrote:
> A table has a column of dates and times that look like this:
>
> 2015-10-02 07:55:02
> 2015-10-02 07:55:02
> 2015-10-02 10:00:03
> 2015-10-02 10:05:02
> 2015-10-02 10:10:02
>
>
> Schema:
> CREATE TABLE general (
A table has a column of dates and times that look like this:
2015-10-02 07:55:02
2015-10-02 07:55:02
2015-10-02 10:00:03
2015-10-02 10:05:02
2015-10-02 10:10:02
Schema:
CREATE TABLE general ( id integer primary key autoincrement, server
text, date_time_stamp text);
Would like to get the
Yes, you seem to understand the issue. The issue only happens when using
shared caches.
I've reproduced the issue using both SERIALIZED and MULTITHREADED modes.
I'm surprised to hear you say that it might be an inherit limitation or
something not necessarily undesirable. Of course, when using
Which OS are you running on?
On Windows for example, PYTHON will use the version of the sqlite3.dll found in
%PYTHONHOME%\DLLs by default. You can change the DLL in that location to the
version that you want to use and it will usually work just fine ...
> -Original Message-
> From:
Hi Bence,
Is the plugin you maintain open source, or is it a custom plugin for
your application?
I tried my version with SQLite 3.13.0 on Windows 8.1 (both x86 and
x64), Windows Phone 8.1 (arm), Windows 10 (both x86 and x64), and
Windows 10 mobile (arm), all in Debug mode, and with my test case
On 7/11/16, Janos Levai wrote:
> Dear sqlite devs,
>
> Are there any downsides to setting ENABLE_UPDATE_DELETE_LIMIT when creating
> the official amalgamation? Will users of the amalgamation, not
> needing ENABLE_UPDATE_DELETE_LIMIT, see any issues?
Yes.
On 7/11/16, David Lederkremer wrote:
> I am using a library that is CEROD-enabled and still I cannot open my
> CEROD-encrypted DB. It has no password so I'm supposed to use the prefix
> ':cerod::' but when I use it like this:
>
>> import sqlite3
>
>> conn =
Hi Chris,
Your plugin is looking good, but my problem is, that I can maintain only
my plugin. I don't have access to the main application. I just get the
commands from there, and my main job with this plugin is that I have to
keep updated the database, communicate with the server, etc... The
Did you see the Cordova-sqlite-storage plugin that I maintain? It
supports Windows 8.1, Windows Phone 8.1, and Windows 10 UWP in
addition to Android and iOS. It uses the SQLite3-WinRT C++ library
which I think is better than using .NET/C#.
The following test case works fine for me when I try it
On 11 Jul 2016, at 3:17pm, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> Janos Levai wrote:
>> Are there any downsides to setting ENABLE_UPDATE_DELETE_LIMIT when creating
>> the official amalgamation? Will users of the amalgamation, not
>> needing ENABLE_UPDATE_DELETE_LIMIT, see any issues?
>
>
Janos Levai wrote:
> Are there any downsides to setting ENABLE_UPDATE_DELETE_LIMIT when creating
> the official amalgamation? Will users of the amalgamation, not
> needing ENABLE_UPDATE_DELETE_LIMIT, see any issues?
They might be tempted to use it.
Regards,
Clemens
Dear sqlite devs,
Are there any downsides to setting ENABLE_UPDATE_DELETE_LIMIT when creating
the official amalgamation? Will users of the amalgamation, not
needing ENABLE_UPDATE_DELETE_LIMIT, see any issues?
Thanks,
Janos Levai
___
sqlite-users
I am using a library that is CEROD-enabled and still I cannot open my
CEROD-encrypted DB. It has no password so I'm supposed to use the prefix
':cerod::' but when I use it like this:
> import sqlite3
> conn = sqlite3.connect(':cerod::example.db')
> cursor = conn.cursor()
>
On 7/11/16, pavel.pimenov wrote:
> Hi
>
> journal_mode=PERSIST ! but sqlite 3.13.0 tries to open a file
> *.sqlite-wal
SQLite does not know the journal mode until it has opened the
database. And it cannot safely open the database without first
checking for the
On 7/10/16, Hakan Yüksel wrote:
> Hi i detect a bug theirs result should be same but it is not
>
> select replace( cast (1 as real) , "." , "") , 1
The "cast(1 as real)" expression results in "1.0". The
"replace('1.0', '.', '')" expression results in "10". SQLite
Dear SQLite developers,
I'm creating a plugin under Cordova framework targeting Win10 (UWP), so
my project is in c# with WinRT. I'm using SQLite3 successfully. I have
the reference for the SQLite.Net.Core-PCL and SQLite.Net-PCL (v3.1.1),
and added the SQLite3 for my Win10 project, using the
Hi
journal_mode=PERSIST ! but sqlite 3.13.0 tries to open a file
*.sqlite-wal
Process monitor log:
https://yadi.sk/i/nf6MQ4cNtBD4j
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
Hi i detect a bug theirs result should be same but it is not
select replace( cast (1 as real) , "." , "") , 1
thanks in advance...
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
On 07/11/2016 11:18 AM, 刘翔 wrote:
Dear SQLite developers,
Sqlite version: 3.8.8.3
Linux version: 3.10.31-ltsi
Question:
We found when updated a sqlite database in emmc disk, it cannot remove
journal file as soon as the transaction finished.
We know after the transaction finishes, SQLite will
24 matches
Mail list logo