As indicated by "Random Coder", the problem was that I was missing the
required dependencies.
Thank you.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:03 PM Thomas Kurz wrote:
> Are both of the same architecture, either 32bit or 64bit?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Kyle
> To:
Are both of the same architecture, either 32bit or 64bit?
- Original Message -
From: Kyle
To: sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019, 23:30:35
Subject: [sqlite] Problems loading extensions on Windows 10
I am having problems loading sqlite3 extensions on
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 2:30 PM Kyle wrote:
> I have downloaded both sqlite3 and mod_spatialite.dll (the extension) and
> copied them to C:\Windows\System32.
>
> When I run
> SELECT load_extension('mod_spatialite')
> sqlite returns "Error: the specified module could not be found"
Helpfully,
I am having problems loading sqlite3 extensions on Windows 10.
I have downloaded both sqlite3 and mod_spatialite.dll (the extension) and
copied them to C:\Windows\System32.
When I run
SELECT load_extension('mod_spatialite')
sqlite returns "Error: the specified module could not be found"
I
On Tuesday, 5 March, 2019 12:53, James K. Lowden
wrote:
>On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 20:20:08 -0700> "Keith Medcalf"
>wrote:
>> In the first query the subselect that creates the list is
>> independent.
>> In the second query the subselect that creates the list is
>> correlated.
>Yes, and if it can
And if it does still crash, please provide the database schema to help with
debugging.
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org] On
Behalf Of Simon Slavin
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2019 3:14 PM
To: SQLite mailing list
Subject: Re:
On 5 Mar 2019, at 8:06pm, Peter Hardman wrote:
> If i run the following query from Python 3.7 using the sqlite3 DBAPI adapter
> or from sqlitebrowser I get a segmentation fault.
Please find the SQLite command-line tool on your computer. If you don't
already have one you can download one for
If i run the following query from Python 3.7 using the sqlite3 DBAPI
adapter or from sqlitebrowser I get a segmentation fault.
The query runs error free on PostgreSQL 9.6
The query fails if the 'in' list has more than two entries.
Any ideas? I could create a test database but it will take a
On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 20:20:08 -0700
"Keith Medcalf" wrote:
> In the first query the subselect that creates the list is independent.
> In the second query the subselect that creates the list is correlated.
Yes, and if it can be shown that the two queries are logically
equivalent under relational
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 08:13:32 +
Hick Gunter wrote:
> The second statement uses a *correlated* subquery as the RHS of an IN
> expression. The QP needs to actually run this query for every record
> of t1 that matches the condition t1.c == 1.
I'm not sure what you mean be "needs", above. If
On Tuesday, 5 March, 2019 04:09, Simon Slavin wrote:
>On 5 Mar 2019, at 2:06am, kk wrote:
select * from t1
where c=1 and d in (select d from t2 where c=1);
select * from t1
where c=1 and d in (select d from t2 where t2.c=t1.c);
>> DRH, many thanks for your reply, I
On 5 Mar 2019, at 2:06am, kk wrote:
>>> select * from t1
>>>where c=1 and d in (select d from t2 where c=1);
>>> select * from t1
>>>where c=1 and d in (select d from t2 where t2.c=t1.c);
> DRH, many thanks for your reply, I was expecting same output because I
> believe stmts to be
On 5 Mar 2019, at 3:22am, Rowan Worth wrote:
> Wait what? If I've understood correctly you're describing a situation where
> statements outlive their transaction context?
The documentation on transactions covers this possibility. This includes
continuing to do _step() for one statement while
On 2019/03/05 4:06 AM, kk wrote:
On 05/03/2019 01:33, Richard Hipp wrote:
create table t1(c,d);
create table t2(c,d);
explain select * from t1
where c=1 and d in (select d from t2 where c=1);
explain select * from t1
where c=1 and d in (select d from t2 where t2.c=t1.c);
DRH, many
Both statements generate the same result set, but they are neither equivalent
nor equally fast.
The first statement uses a *constant* subquery as the RHS of an IN expression.
The QP is free to materialize this query (i.e. run it once and keep the results
in an "ephemeral" table with an index
15 matches
Mail list logo
