Of course, the correlated version returns all books, not just the ones that
have at least one author, were read at least once, and have at least one genre.
---
The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says a
lot about anticipated traffic volume.
>-Original
The current tip of trunk produced the same results demonstrated by Niklas in
his original post for his original testcase for me.
I would have written the query as a simple query with correlated subqueries to
get the concatenated data as it is a "more natural" declaration of what is
wanted (in
Sure it’s documented in the release log, but it’s not documented in the C-API
(https://sqlite.org/c3ref/expanded_sql.html), and it’s not documented among
every other compile-time option (https://www.sqlite.org/compile.html).
I don’t know why you listed that second link. It doesn’t mention
On 15 Mar 2019, at 7:35am, niklas wrote:
> Dropping analyze (sqlite_stat1) information from the database made
> the problem go away, i.e. made sqlite use index instead of scanning.
Instead of dropping ANALYZE information, did you try updating it instead, by
running ANALYZE again ?
Ah ...
>
I recently noticed some very slow queries for my sqlite book database.
Turns out that it happened due to the query planner decided to scan
sub-queries instead of using an automatic covering index to search them.
The database contains about 3000 entries and with two subqueries it
took a
Actually It is documented
See https://sqlite.org/changes.html look for release 3.26.0
and https://sqlite.org/c3ref/expanded_sql.html
and https://sqlite.org/releaselog/3_26_0.html where the compile option is
mentioned
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: sqlite-users
Yes sorry, it was a erroneous copy-paste. I was referring to
sqlite3_normalized_sql().
As Keith said, it’s only available if the SQLITE_ENABLE_NORMALIZE compile
option is used, but that is not documented anywhere.
> On Mar 15, 2019, at 3:56 AM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
>
> These docs:
>
>
On 3/15/19, Max Vlasov wrote:
>
> But 3.27.2 said
> malformed database schema ({sqlite_autoindex_mytablename}_1) - orphan
> index.
This error message arises from enhanced early detection of corrupt
database files that was added to version 3.27.x. Do you still have
the original database,
Hi,
I have a database that used in software since probably 2010, there are many
variants of this database at my hd and everything was fine with it starting
3.6.10 through 3.26.00, I'm not sure about every version, but during the
version history, at least several was used to open it.
But 3.27.2
On 3/15/19, Scott Perry wrote:
> The behaviour of ALTER TABLE changed in 3.25.0 and breaks compatibility with
> many existing applications. Your statements (corrected for use of single
> quotes, as Ryan mentioned) work for me when `PRAGMA legacy_alter_table=1;`.
All true. But even so, SQLite
The behaviour of ALTER TABLE changed in 3.25.0 and breaks compatibility with
many existing applications. Your statements (corrected for use of single
quotes, as Ryan mentioned) work for me when `PRAGMA legacy_alter_table=1;`.
More info on SQLite's website:
Link to my database in in the original post.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RCPoPgoLdc2VgF2uX2zPFrkheFi9z3b_/view?usp=sharing
Tomasz Jerzykowski
W dniu 2019-03-15 14:46:19 użytkownik R Smith napisał:
> For a start, do not use single quotes for table names. In SQL, DB object
> identifiers
For a start, do not use single quotes for table names. In SQL, DB object
identifiers can either be unquoted or contained in double-quotes. SQLite
specifically even allows backticks or square brackets for compatibility,
but nobody likes single quotes.
I.e. change this:
drop table
On 15 Mar 2019, at 10:29am, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
wrote:
> What differ between *.db *.db3 *.sqlie2 *.slite3 files?
Be very careful of .sqlite2 files. The name suggests an obsolete version of
SQLite that is incompatible with everything from the last decade.
Apart from that, SQLite databases
I'm having corruption problem with a certain database file. You can download it
here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RCPoPgoLdc2VgF2uX2zPFrkheFi9z3b_/view?usp=sharing
It was created with SQLite 3.8.7 or older version (I cannot say for sure now)
I open it with sqlite3.exe and run the following
On 3/15/19, Wout Mertens wrote:
> it expired in January… Looks like the Let's Encrypt client isn't
> auto-updating the certificates.
I got a new cert yesterday, or maybe the day before, and it was
working fine. Then overnight, something happened to revert the cert
to one from last year. I'm
A sqlite database is just a file. You can name it whatever you want. People
who like file extensions often use such ones (I assume you meant .sqlite2
and .sqlite3? The first would likely be used to indicate a sqlite 2
database, assuming you can find any software that still uses it...)
On Fri, Mar
SQLite doesn't enforce types, but it does accept them.
They're documented at https://www.sqlite.org/datatype3.html
Basically, you want INTEGER and TEXT. There's no date type. I recommend
storing those as epoch integer, or in ISO text format, so that they're easy
to parse and sort correctly.
it expired in January… Looks like the Let's Encrypt client isn't
auto-updating the certificates.
Wout.
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
What differ between *.db *.db3 *.sqlie2 *.slite3 files?
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Hello,
I have some tables in mysql with the following data types:
smallint
text
varchar
date
I don't know sqlite, What are corresponding above data types in sqlite?
--Regards
Mohsen
___
sqlite-users mailing list
These docs:
https://sqlite.org/c3ref/expanded_sql.html
The sqlite3_sql and sqlite3_expanded_sql are always be available.
The sqlite3_normalized_sql interface is only available if the
SQLITE_ENABLE_NORMALIZE compile option is used.
---
The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a
Or just boring old autocorrect shenanigans...
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019, 12:20 AM Hick Gunter wrote:
> Which release of sqlite are you referrring to? I am unaware of any
> function call with a prefix of sqldark in release 3.24? Maybe this is an
> addon/wrapper/whatever from the Sith?
>
>
Which release of sqlite are you referrring to? I am unaware of any function
call with a prefix of sqldark in release 3.24? Maybe this is an
addon/wrapper/whatever from the Sith?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: sqlite-users [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org] Im
Auftrag
24 matches
Mail list logo
