Re: [sqlite] v3.0.1 sqlite3_mprintf

2004-06-24 Thread Julian Brierley
Hans-Juergen Taenzer wrote: hello, doing some tests with the new version, I have encountered a problem: void testva(void) { char *s; unsigned long ul1 = 0x7FFF; unsigned long ul2 = 0x; s = sqlite3_mprintf("%lu", ul1); printf("ul1: %lx, %s\n", ul1, s); s = sqlite3_mprin

Re: [sqlite] SQLite v3.0 - compiling under Windows

2004-06-22 Thread Julian Brierley
D. Richard Hipp wrote: George Ionescu wrote: Hello SQLite users, Hello Dr. Hipp, What would be your advice regarding compiling SQLite under Windows: - wait until it's more MSVC 6.0 friendly or - start using Visual C++ 2003 ? I've made changes so that CVS HEAD should compile under MSVC 6.0.

Re: [sqlite] SQLite v3.0 - compiling under Windows

2004-06-22 Thread Julian Brierley
D. Richard Hipp wrote: In MSVC and in Borland, a signed 64-bit integer is __int64, right? What's an unsigned 64-bit integer on those compilers? Do MSVC and Borland support the "long double" type? 64-bit integer in MSVC 6.0: Use "__int64" for signed and "unsigned __int64" for unsigned. MSVC 2003 a

Re: [sqlite] SQLite v3.0 - compiling under Windows

2004-06-22 Thread Julian Brierley
Hans-Juergen Taenzer wrote: George Ionescu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > What would be your advice regarding compiling SQLite under > Windows: > - wait until it's more MSVC 6.0 friendly or > - start using Visual C++ 2003 ? Even with Visual C++ 2003 there are problems: VC 13 now supports the