Re: [sqlite] Client/Srever SQLite

2008-06-14 Thread Rick Langschultz
I am using SQLite for a storage backend for a phone application, the application downloads the information from an XML-RPC based host and sends information to and from a database. The data is held in the database so the phone application doesn't have to get all the information every 15 minu

Re: [sqlite] SQLite and OS X - Can I have multiple versions?

2008-01-28 Thread Rick Langschultz
What I did was used the SQLite sources and added them into a Carbon framework. Then set sqlite3.h and the other source header to public. That way I could call the functions. Then i set the installation path to @executable_path/../Frameworks, then added a new copy phase and copied the target

Re: [sqlite] Next Version of SQLite

2008-01-13 Thread Rick Langschultz
I was wondering what would constitute the creation of SQLite 4.0? Since the VDBE is being revamped I would consider this a pretty big revamp of the SQLite code. I am looking forward to testing this out new engine out. I also wanted to know what the difference between stack based and regis

Re: [sqlite] Database Commoditization and SQLite

2008-01-07 Thread Rick Langschultz
That is a great point. But it does help me slim down my app for testing before deployment on another database On Jan 7, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Scott Baker wrote: Rick Langschultz wrote: I think commercial database solutions have their place in the market, and I don't think Richard looks b

Re: [sqlite] Database Commoditization and SQLite

2008-01-07 Thread Rick Langschultz
I think commercial database solutions have their place in the market, and I don't think Richard looks bad in this article. He simply created something that needed to be created. When I am developing an application that uses a database I first lay everything out on whiteboard, then I write s

Re: [sqlite] Should the next release be 3.5.4 or 3.6.0?

2007-12-13 Thread Rick Langschultz
My question first is can this fix be rolled into a group of related fixes thus creating a service patch? If not then my opinion is 3.5.4. If you can roll it in with 3 - 10 easy fixes call it 3.6.0. Just an opinion though. I am waiting for 4.0, like it is Xmas Eve... On Dec 13, 2007, at 10:4

Re: [sqlite] SQLite is in Android

2007-12-05 Thread Rick Langschultz
Actually the SQLite Database doesn't need to be encrypted it shouldn't be jailbroken or hacked into, or broken in any way. Also I am sure that an encryption algorithm inside the iPhone would cause long boot times, etc. and space issues since it already has limited space for the actual OS an

Re: [sqlite] Request for help with the SQLite Website

2007-11-13 Thread Rick Langschultz
This is a big improvement to the website. Keep up the great work on SQLite. Looking forward to 4.0 On Nov 13, 2007, at 7:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The new look for the SQLite website is now in place, if you haven't already noticed: http://www.sqlite.org/ Even though the new look is