Hi, I currently start a :memory: database and then attach a physical
database and then set wal mode by using
PRAGMA mydb.journal_mode=WAL
1. Is this safe? (I noticed default is 'delete')
2. Can I do it automatically with the ATTACH? So I don't have to wait 150
ms for the WAL PRAGMA statement?
___
that is a lot of 1s and 0s.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> System.Data.SQLite version 1.0.100.0 (with SQLite 3.12.1) is now available
> on the System.Data.SQLite website:
>
> https://system.data.sqlite.org/
>
> Further information about this release can be seen
found it - old copy of cerod slipped into my sqlite3.c!
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Tim Uy wrote:
> yup must be just me, it works fine on a clean fossil clone
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Tim Uy wrote:
>
>> It is probably just something I mangled - but oddly my
yup must be just me, it works fine on a clean fossil clone
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Tim Uy wrote:
> It is probably just something I mangled - but oddly my tsrc/fts5.c has no
> trace of sqlite3PagerGet and no more than 2 or so lines.
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:07 PM, T
It is probably just something I mangled - but oddly my tsrc/fts5.c has no
trace of sqlite3PagerGet and no more than 2 or so lines.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Tim Uy wrote:
> I'm getting
>
> tsrc/fts5.c(23549): error C2198: 'sqlite3PagerGet': too few arguments
I'm getting
tsrc/fts5.c(23549): error C2198: 'sqlite3PagerGet': too few arguments for
call
tsrc/fts5.c(23568): error C2198: 'sqlite3PagerGet': too few arguments for
call
What am I missing? :P
What does <> <> mean in Makefile.msc? Just noticed it.
Will the ICU tokenizer work with FTS5, or does some work need to be done to
port it over (slight pun intended).
lite.org/c3ref/limit.html>(db,
SQLITE_LIMIT_ATTACHED
<https://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/c_limit_attached.html#sqlitelimitattached>,size)
interface."
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Tim Uy wrote:
> Well, probably only like a dozen, no worries.
>
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:07 AM,
Well, probably only like a dozen, no worries.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Simon Slavin wrote:
>
> On 4 Mar 2016, at 4:02pm, Tim Uy wrote:
>
> > So Richard, theoretically, if you use negative numbers, you can get
> another
> > x2?
>
> Tim,
>
> are you ac
(or use unsigned)
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Tim Uy wrote:
> So Richard, theoretically, if you use negative numbers, you can get
> another x2?
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Tim Uy wrote:
>
>> (Thanks Richard for the explanation of "main" and "te
So Richard, theoretically, if you use negative numbers, you can get another
x2?
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Tim Uy wrote:
> (Thanks Richard for the explanation of "main" and "temp".)
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Tim Uy wrote:
>
>> So comme
(Thanks Richard for the explanation of "main" and "temp".)
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Tim Uy wrote:
> So comment in sqliteLimit just needs an update?
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>> On 3/3/16, John McKown wrote:
So comment in sqliteLimit just needs an update?
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 3/3/16, John McKown wrote:
> > Why 125 would be a good question.
>
> The maximum value of an signed 8-bit integer is 127. Take away two
> for the "main" and "temp" databases.
>
> --
> D. R
Hi, I see that there is a default limit of 10 attached databases. And from
the docs, 125 is limit. However, in the file sqliteLimit.h it says
/*
** The maximum number of attached databases. This must be between 0
** and 62. The upper bound on 62 is because a 64-bit integer bitmap
** is used inte
Exactly. How does this happen?
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Jay Kreibich wrote:
>
> > On Nov 10, 2015, at 2:45 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> >
> >> On Nov 10, 2015, at 1:29 PM, Rousselot, Richard A <
> Richard.A.Rousselot at centurylink.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> What no love for their own Access DB
16 matches
Mail list logo
