t; If you're looking for cross-platform you need to select protocols that
Mrs.> have well defined semantics. HTTP sounds like a good bet. Full file copy
Mrs.> sounds like a better one.
My app will access the files on the network (LAN) as if theyre local.
--
Best regards,
djmmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
act.
The size of a file depends for example on the cluster size of the
underlying partition. And regardless is of little value in comparing
two files; the same file size/name doesnt mean two files are
identical.
Mrs.> You still haven't said what platform you're developing for.
Hello,
Wednesday, August 3, 2005, 4:41:24 AM, you wrote:
> No, none of those things are guaranteed. If there's even a single
> writer it can be unsafe (consider AFS putting a corrupt journal up
> that clients notice download, and thrash their local copy).
But Im saying there -wont- be a single w
much to know
the answer to the question if there's anybody reading who knows it?
Thanks ion Advance.
--
Best regards,
djmmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nobody?
> Hello,
> The documentation suggests that its unsafe to use SQLite when the
> database file is on a windows network server and various other
> machines may want to simultaneously access it. If however none of
> these machines change the data in the databse (all accesses are just
> querie
> I think you are looking at the sqlite2 documentation, not sqlite3!
> sqlite_compile was changed to sqlite3_prepare in sqlite 3 (with very
> different schematics, so readily closely)
> sqlite3_step still exists, but it takes different arguments
Thanks. Have it now. I had downloaded the page
regards,
djm mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" which were presumably menat to be "upgraded" to "3"
versions but are now just missing. The main.c file also contains the
comments "..The following routine destroys a virtual machine that is created by
** the sqlite3_compile() routine.."
--
Best regards,
djm mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
8 matches
Mail list logo