Can we clone (push, pull, sync) the forum fossil?
Ingo
On 12-3-2020 21:17, Richard Hipp wrote:
The Forum is powered by Fossil.
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
n "without a server".
>
client-serverless?
although I've always thought of it as an in-proces DB-library.
ingo
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
f advantage to
put only that one table in a separate database and attach it when
needed. There would be no need then to drop it, one could just detach
and delete the db.
Ingo
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://maili
ult in strange results and not in an error.
Thanks Richard,
Ingo
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
.etc
results in:
{"data":"[{\"type\":\"notebook\",\"id\":2,\"attributes\":{\"book\":\"brew\",\...
etc
the array is a string?
besides manually constructing with:
|| json_quotes('data')
|| ":["
|| group_conca
Haha :) Thanks for the insight. Hadn't looked at it that way.
Ingo
On 28-6-2019 11:52, Warren Young wrote:
> You’ve basically got it backwards.
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org
saw this happen and
wondered while setting up SQLTools on Sublime for SQLite. It
doesn't/can't create a persistent connection)
Ingo
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
h, start with the
diagrams and if the SQL does not work, find the exception why in the text.
Ingo
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
played with is two indexes, one unique on (id,
ts_from) to find the last version if eol is not null and one unique on
(id, ts_eol) where eol = null to find the current active version of id.
Thanks,
Ingo
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglis
deterministic,
or because current_timestamp is not,
or both?
Ingo
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Sam,
Can't answer your question directly, maybe the closure extension is
something for you. To read a bit about it:
http://charlesleifer.com/blog/querying-tree-structures-in-sqlite-using-python-and-the-transitive-closure-extension/
ingo
On 18-6-2019 14:19, Sam Carleton wrote:
> My
On 16-6-2019 15:11, Adrian Ho wrote:
> Common table expression are not supported for statements inside of
> triggers.
Ah, I searched the docs for 'upsert', 'with' ...
Thanks.
ingo
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-use
Upon creation, the trigger below gives a syntax error near INSERT.
Without the trigger surrounding it, the query works well.
The docs give me no clue to what goes wrong.
Ingo
---%<--%<--%<---
CREATE TRIGGER IF NOT EXISTS update_balances
AFTER INSERT ON journal
BEGIN
WITH inup(a
On 5-6-2019 12:52, Richard Hipp wrote:
> WHERE param='_'
query executed,
thanks,
ingo
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
(id, param)
DO UPDATE
SET param = 'updated';
--Error: ON CONFLICT clause does not match any PRIMARY KEY or UNIQUE
constraint
ingo
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
l
>
> It also states that NULL1 == NULL2 is TRUE in UNION and DISTINCT contices.
>
Thanks,
ingo
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
ut it is not elegant to me,
TIA,
ingo
---%<--%<--%<---
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS person (
pid INTEGER NOT NULL,
full_name TEXT,
ts_to TEXT DEFAULT NULL
);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_person
ON person (pid, ts_to)
WHERE ts_to ISNULL
;
INSERT INTO person (
...> );
Error: key type should be INT, TEXT, or BLOB
Using TXT or BLOB there is no error. Did I go wrong somewhere?
Ingo
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
breaking the grammar.
* Mark up the -init option in the text.
* Use the standard AUTHORS section instead of a custom AUTHOR section.
Thank you for maintaining sqlite!
Yours,
Ingo
--
Ingo Schwarze
mandoc developer - http://mdocml.bsd.lv
;-)
I've tried a subselect in the join but I've missed the (somehow obvious)
min(ID) part.
Ingo
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
ourse by means of triggers, database
procedures and functions).
Normally, if handled internally, the database is much faster to do the adequate
things than an application through an interface can do.
And as a result of that this is the single point on my wish list for SQLite:
Stored procedu
EVENTTYPE
I thought about that too, but I didn't want to keep track of an additional ID in
the application but instead let the database do the work.
Maybe an additional table for the current eventid and a on insert trigger could
do the trick w
Hi,
I've got a question concerning a query with subselects.
I have a table with stores pairs of events. one of the events is
kind of a start event and the other one is a stop event.
Each event is stored in its own row. What I'm trying to achive is to
get a view which contains rows with the start e
Hi Scott!
You're great! I checked the attached modification and found no search
taking longer than 20s now! It's a great improvement. I didn't find any
other problems, so I will leave the modification in my FTS3 compilation.
Many thanks!
Ingo
Scott Hess schrieb:
2007/
search phrase will take
longer than 30 seconds I use the standard SQLITE3 search algorithm.
That's a workaround for today, but I consider someone being here who
could improve the algorithm behaviour of FTS3?
By the way, as I wrote above, the "r
Yves Goergen schrieb:
> On 13.05.2007 17:19 CE(S)T, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:07:16PM +0200, Yves Goergen wrote:
>>
>>> Ah, now I realised that I'd also like to have that "natural sorting",
>>> meaning this:
>>>
>>> 2
>>> 8
>>> 9
>>> 10
>>> 11
>>> 23
>> select from from t
Yves Goergen wrote:
> I guess that doesn't work when I'm accessing the database through the
> System.Data.SQLite interface in .NET?
Fortunately your guess is wrong. ;-) System.Data.SQLite supports
user defined collation sequences. See TestCases.cs of the source
distribution for samples how to i
27 matches
Mail list logo