Where's the like button when you actually want to use it?
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:05 PM, James K. Lowden
wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:19:33 -0800
> Roger Binns wrote:
>
> > On talking to sites that had the competitor devices, we'd find they
> > did notice increases in programs crashing and
Em 13/11/2015 15:29, "A. Mannini" escreveu:
>
> Hi,
>
> i read SQLite FAQ and understood that use of SQLite on network share CAN
> corrupts database file.
> Fo me, it isn't clear if there is a way to safely use SQLite on a
> network share in contests with few clients (max 5 for ex) and low read /
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:19:33 -0800
Roger Binns wrote:
> On talking to sites that had the competitor devices, we'd find they
> did notice increases in programs crashing and data file issues, but
> had written it off as the kind of thing that happens with Windows.
Q: Why doesn't Microsoft write
I've read through all the other posts on this thread, and I must agree.
Your "serverless" configuration can't exist because each client becomes a
server, BY DEFINITION, when it starts PROVIDING information to other
clients.
I've written a book, by now, when this topic comes up. Believe me
Alessan
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:15 PM, A. Mannini
wrote:
> Yes I use it in other contests but, as written in another message, in
> need a serverless solutions.
>
A shared filesystem _is_ a network service! Since they have a system
sharing a drive, they can just as easily install MySQL on it and comp
> Why do you think that is a problem? (the x86_64)?
>
Yes there isn't a x64 Jet version. Or at least, there is the ACE x64 but
can't be installed side-by-side to Office 32 bit.
> Other suggests are welcomed?
> Microsoft SQL Server is free (with a limitation of a 4GB database) and it
> probably i
On 2015/11/13 10:52 PM, A. Mannini wrote:
>> Basically the decision is easy - If you require either of:
>> - Network data
>> - User control
>>
>> Then you should use a suited Network DB and not a file-based DB. Best
>> free (without limitations) choices are (In no particular order):
>> - PostGres
On 2015/11/13 9:55 PM, A. Mannini wrote:
> Ok, thanks for all your replies!!!
>
> First, i was asking to understand...before to start development in a
> wrong direction.
>
> I don't have experience with SQLite and even less on a network share. I
> would understand if corruption is a remote possib
> Basically the decision is easy - If you require either of:
> - Network data
> - User control
>
> Then you should use a suited Network DB and not a file-based DB. Best
> free (without limitations) choices are (In no particular order):
> - PostGres | http://www.postgresql.org/
> - MariaDB / MySQL
On 13 Nov 2015, at 6:46pm, A. Mannini wrote:
> 1) is there a list of FS where SQLite works fine?
It's not usually the FS which is causing the problem. When your application
tells the OS to write to a remote disk ...
program calls OS API to write to a file
OS calls Network FS on client
Ok, thanks for all your replies!!!
First, i was asking to understand...before to start development in a
wrong direction.
I don't have experience with SQLite and even less on a network share. I
would understand if corruption is a remote possibility or a certainty.
Someone said that Access suffer
You said you wanted something that didn't require too much skill to
set up? PostgreSQL seems safer and easier than implementing VFS
yourself. One is **slightly** less error-prone than the other.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
> You realize that the marketing translation of
Il 13/11/2015 19:31, Richard Hipp ha scritto:
> On 11/13/15, A. Mannini wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i read SQLite FAQ and understood that use of SQLite on network share CAN
>> corrupts database file.
>> Fo me, it isn't clear if there is a way to safely use SQLite on a
>> network share in contests with few
Hi,
i read SQLite FAQ and understood that use of SQLite on network share CAN
corrupts database file.
Fo me, it isn't clear if there is a way to safely use SQLite on a
network share in contests with few clients (max 5 for ex) and low read /
write concurrency..
Thanks
Alessandro
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 18:29:32 +,
A. Mannini wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i read SQLite FAQ and understood that use of SQLite on network share CAN
> corrupts database file.
> Fo me, it isn't clear if there is a way to safely use SQLite on a
> network share in contests with few clients (max 5 for ex) and
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
> People on this mailing list can't do your risk assessment or
> impact analysis for you.
>
> Best regards,
> Niall O'Reilly
>
Seconded.
You asked if there was a way to safely use it. I don't think there is.
You also mentioned "max 5
> > Why do you think that is a problem? (the x86_64)?
> Yes there isn't a x64 Jet version. Or at least, there is the ACE x64 but
> can't be installed side-by-side to Office 32 bit.
Ah, I see. Microsoft introduces artificial restrictions "because they can".
Just like they could have fixed all
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 1:46 PM, A. Mannini
wrote:
> 2) why there are SERVERLESS database (MS Access or VistaDB) that works
> without FS restrictions?
If you think Access works reliably on a network share, you're going to
run in to trouble sooner or later:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb
> Ok, thanks for all your replies!!!
>
> First, i was asking to understand...before to start development in a
> wrong direction.
>
> I don't have experience with SQLite and even less on a network share. I
> would understand if corruption is a remote possibility or a certainty.
>
> Someone said
On Friday, 13 November, 2015 12:55 A. Mannini
said:
> About VistaDB it support use on network share look at
> http://www.gibraltarsoftware.com/Support/VistaDB/Documentation/WebFrame.ht
> ml#VistaDB_Introduction_SupportedPlatforms.html
> and confirmed from its support. Unfortunately i have not e
On 11/13/15, A. Mannini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i read SQLite FAQ and understood that use of SQLite on network share CAN
> corrupts database file.
> Fo me, it isn't clear if there is a way to safely use SQLite on a
> network share in contests with few clients (max 5 for ex) and low read /
> write concurr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/13/2015 11:55 AM, A. Mannini wrote:
> About VistaDB it support use on network share look at
> http://www.gibraltarsoftware.com/Support/VistaDB/Documentation/WebFram
e.html#VistaDB_Introduction_SupportedPlatforms.html
>
>
and confirmed from its
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:55 PM, A. Mannini
wrote:
>
> Ok, thanks for all your replies!!!
>
> First, i was asking to understand...before to start development in a
> wrong direction.
>
> I don't have experience with SQLite and even less on a network share. I
> would understand if corruption is a r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/13/2015 10:46 AM, A. Mannini wrote:
> 1) is there a list of FS where SQLite works fine?
I don't know of any. Network filesystems are very hard to implement
(so many corner cases), and there is a lot of complexity if you also
want them to be per
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/13/2015 10:31 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Just be warned that there are many network filesystems that claim
> to implement locks correctly, and do most of the time, but
> sometimes mess up
It is also worth mentioning that SQLite trusts the filesys
25 matches
Mail list logo
