Re: [sqlite] [SOLVED] Re: [sqlite] nfs 'sillynames'

2004-09-16 Thread Ara.T.Howard
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If this were implemented, it would remove the capability to go into the background. A common thing for a daemon process to do upon start-up is to get everything initialized (e.g. open databases and do other things that could fail and would need to be re

Re: [sqlite] [SOLVED] Re: [sqlite] nfs 'sillynames'

2004-09-16 Thread Derrell . Lipman
"Ara.T.Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > the problem is that the child inherits all the open fds from the 'begin > transaction' (sqlite db-journal, etc.). in my case, the child never uses > these at all. regardless, when the parent does the unlink the sillyname is > created. > > the child co

[sqlite] [SOLVED] Re: [sqlite] nfs 'sillynames'

2004-09-16 Thread Ara.T.Howard
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, John LeSueur wrote: a followup on this post: i was running some straces on sqlite while it using transactions and think i may have found the source of the problem, we see this in in the strace output: ... ... close(5)= 0 unlink("/dmsp/m