Christopher Petrilli wrote:
On 5/3/05, D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 17:52 -0400, Christopher Petrilli wrote:
I'm wondering if the availability of 128-bit numbers has ever been
contemplated? The reason I'm asking is that I have an application that
needs to
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 18:25 -0400, Christopher Petrilli wrote:
> On 5/3/05, D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 17:52 -0400, Christopher Petrilli wrote:
> > > I'm wondering if the availability of 128-bit numbers has ever been
> > > contemplated? The reason I'm askin
On 5/3/05, D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 17:52 -0400, Christopher Petrilli wrote:
> > I'm wondering if the availability of 128-bit numbers has ever been
> > contemplated? The reason I'm asking is that I have an application that
> > needs to store IPv6 addresses,
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 17:52 -0400, Christopher Petrilli wrote:
> I'm wondering if the availability of 128-bit numbers has ever been
> contemplated? The reason I'm asking is that I have an application that
> needs to store IPv6 addresses, which are 128bits. Right now, I'm
> storing them in 2 64-bit
I'm wondering if the availability of 128-bit numbers has ever been
contemplated? The reason I'm asking is that I have an application that
needs to store IPv6 addresses, which are 128bits. Right now, I'm
storing them in 2 64-bit fields, but this obviously complicates the
query quite a bit.
Thought
5 matches
Mail list logo