On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 22:04 +, Mr. Tezozomoc wrote:
> Does this mean that the in memory database can be accessed by more than one
> task without giving schema corruption?
> This is the problem I was having the 2.8.x... version...
>
No. You will still need to protect the accesses using mutex
rs@sqlite.org
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: RE: [sqlite] Any successful VxWorks ports out there?
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:13:18 -0500
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 19:35 +, Mr. Tezozomoc wrote:
> I have successfully port 2.8.15 to vxworks
> The in memory database is very problematic
>
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 19:35 +, Mr. Tezozomoc wrote:
> I have successfully port 2.8.15 to vxworks
> The in memory database is very problematic
>
Note that the in-memory database for version 3.x is
completely new and uses a different approach than the
in-memory database in version 2.8.x
ge Follows
From: "Andrew Lukasik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
To: "'sqlite-users@sqlite.org'"
Subject: [sqlite] Any successful VxWorks ports out there?
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:19:49 -0500
I'm currently using SQLite on Linux but
Title: Message
I'm currently using
SQLite on Linux but I'm considering a port to VxWorks. Has anyone done
this successfully? Care to comment? I took a look thru the archives, there
wasn't a whole lot there. I'd be interested in knowing:
a) how
difficult/lengthy was the port
b)
pitfalls/
5 matches
Mail list logo
