On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
> +1 re: recursive queries.
There is a standard for that (in ANSI SQL-99?): recursive 'with' clause, aka
recursive subquery factoring, aka recursive common table expressions.
On Mar 5, 2013, at 8:19 AM, James K. Lowden wrote:
>> Postgresql has also had them for a while.
>
> Yes, and if I'm not mistaken Ingres's QUEL had them long before that.
Yes, many databases have them, from Postgres, MSSQL, Sybase IQ, some flavor of
DB2, to Oracle,
One of the reasons why we have to use PostgreSQL and/or Oracle is for
the 'Window Functions' (AKA: Analytic Functions).
We use SQLite all the time and love it but this one missing feature
bites us.
Could we get some advice from the SQLite core team on the feasibility of
this?
Could it be just
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 02:24:53 -0600
Nico Williams wrote:
> Lies! :) There's one more type of UDF in SQLite3: virtual tables.
> You could have a virtual table where selecting with an equality test
> for some column is "passing an argument" to a "table function". I
> know,
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
> Well, under the hood table functions could use temp, gensym'ed virtual
> tables for all I care. The point is I want table functions :)
SQLite already has table functions of sort: PRAGMAs...
They have their own issues
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
> Right. Virtual Tables are very flexible, but the syntax is indeed not
> practical, and it also forces you to name and "instantiate"
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:19 AM, James K. Lowden
> > 2. Aggregation. The engine passes the rows to be aggregated to the
> > function. After the last row, it calls the function's "xFinal"
> > function, which returns a
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:19 AM, James K. Lowden
wrote:
> Right you are, except it's not a question of efficient but of
> possible. A UDF works one of two ways:
>
> 1. Per row. The engine calls the function for each row. The function
> transforms the input into the
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:51:35 -0500
Ryan Johnson wrote:
> On 04/03/2013 2:20 PM, Petite Abeille wrote:
> > On Mar 4, 2013, at 1:32 AM, James K. Lowden
> > wrote:
> >
> >> What do you have in mind? I've benn adding some user defined
> >>
On 04/03/2013 2:20 PM, Petite Abeille wrote:
On Mar 4, 2013, at 1:32 AM, James K. Lowden wrote:
What do you have in mind? I've benn adding some user defined functions
and am thinking of creating a repository for them.
All the so-called window functions from
On Mar 4, 2013, at 1:32 AM, James K. Lowden wrote:
> What do you have in mind? I've benn adding some user defined functions
> and am thinking of creating a repository for them.
All the so-called window functions from SQL:2003 (aka analytic functions):
"Windowed
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 07:19:11 -0600
"Michael Black" wrote:
> One thing I'll point out...the trigger solution is almost linear
> performance and constant memory where the single SQL statement will
> suffer notably as time goes on in both those measures. Also the
> single SQL
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 18:50:35 +0100
Petite Abeille wrote:
> Ah? if only? SQLite had analytical functions? oh, well..
What do you have in mind? I've benn adding some user defined functions
and am thinking of creating a repository for them.
--jkl
On Mar 3, 2013, at 2:10 PM, "James K. Lowden" wrote:
> There's some cruft, too. I was only demonstrating that it could be
> done. If you find a way to simplify it, you'll know you understand
> it.
Ah… if only… SQLite had analytical functions… oh, well..
mentioned how big his table is going to be.
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of James K. Lowden
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 7:10 AM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Break on cumulative sum
On Sun, 3
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 11:46:26 +0100
Gert Van Assche wrote:
> My SQL knowledge is not yet good enough to understand what you
> proposed, but I hope one day that I will be able to understand and
> replicate myself the code you wrote. I started of with a join on the
> table
James,
I'm very impressed by your solution. My SQL knowledge is not yet good
enough to understand what you proposed, but I hope one day that I will be
able to understand and replicate myself the code you wrote. I started of
with a join on the table itself as well, but I got stuck. I'll study your
On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 14:46:40 +0100
Gert Van Assche wrote:
> All, I don't know how to achieve this: I need to put the cumulative
> sum in a field, and create a group as soon as that cumulative sum is
> over a breakpoint value (10).
This was a bit of a challenge because the
Re: [sqlite] Break on cumulative sum
Michael, this is working perfectly!
I learned a lot with your code.
Thanks a lot for your help.
gert
2013/3/2 Michael Black <mdblac...@yahoo.com>
> I think your "K" row was a typo on the CumulativeValue?
>
> CREATE TABLE [
gt; C|2|7|10|1
> D|4|11|10|1
> E|5|5|10|2
> F|1|6|10|2
> G|1|7|10|2
> H|5|12|10|2
> I|11|11|10|3
> J|8|8|10|4
> K|2|10|10|4
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:
> sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Gert V
8|10|4
K|2|10|10|4
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]
On Behalf Of Gert Van Assche
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 7:47 AM
To: sqlite-users
Subject: [sqlite] Break on cumulative sum
All, I don't know how to achieve this:
All, I don't know how to achieve this: I need to put the cumulative sum in
a field, and create a group as soon as that cumulative sum is over a
breakpoint value (10).
This is an example table:
CREATE TABLE [Test] (TextField, ValueField, CumulativeValue, BreakPoint
DEFAULT 10, GroupName);
insert
22 matches
Mail list logo