On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at sometime, Jay A. Kreibich wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 03:21:58PM +, David Gilbert scratched on the wall:
> > for(jj=0; jj >sqlite3_snprintf(512-nCell,&zCell[nCell],"
> > %f",(double)cell.aCoord[jj].f);
> >
> > That's against 3.7.4 but it looks like it'
I had an impression that for such big number it will be printed in
scientific notation. But I guess that's the difference between %g and
%f. And it turns out my habit of using %g instead of %f is a very good
thing.
Thank you very much for the explanation, Jay.
Pavel
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:06
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:06:33AM -0500, Pavel Ivanov scratched on the wall:
> > ?A favorite interview question is, given this line and no other
> > ?information, how big must buf_size be to never clip the output?
> > ?You can assume the default 1.6 precision ("%1.6f").
> > ? ?snprintf( buf, buf_s
> A favorite interview question is, given this line and no other
> information, how big must buf_size be to never clip the output?
> You can assume the default 1.6 precision ("%1.6f").
> snprintf( buf, buf_size, "%f", v );
> The answer? At least 318 characters.
This is very interesting. Ja
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 03:21:58PM +, David Gilbert scratched on the wall:
> for(jj=0; jjsqlite3_snprintf(512-nCell,&zCell[nCell],"
> %f",(double)cell.aCoord[jj].f);
>
> That's against 3.7.4 but it looks like it's the same in the trunk.
>
> With that change the test suite passes
Hi,
I ran the sqlite3 test suite on ARM Linux (Ubuntu) and got a set of
failures in the
rtree2 set of tests, including the following set:
rtree2-rtree_i32.1.3 rtree2-rtree_i32.1.5.0.2
rtree2-rtree_i32.1.5.10.2 rtree2-rtree_i32.1.5.20.2
rtree2-rtree_i32.1.5.30.2 rtree2-rtree_i32.1.5.40.2
rtree2-r
6 matches
Mail list logo
