ach thread.
From: sqlite-users <sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org> on behalf of
Hick Gunter <h...@scigames.at>
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 9:05 AM
To: 'SQLite mailing list'
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Concurrent reads for VTs with in-memory data structures
We are using a shared m
Nachricht-
Von: sqlite-users [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org] Im
Auftrag von Dimitris Bil
Gesendet: Montag, 03. Juli 2017 19:14
An: sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
Betreff: [sqlite] Concurrent reads for VTs with in-memory data structures
I have some virtual tables
; From: sqlite-users [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org]
> On Behalf Of Dimitris Bil
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 July, 2017 09:19
> To: SQLite mailing list
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Concurrent reads for VTs with in-memory data
> structures
>
> Keith, thanks for y
mailing list
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Concurrent reads for VTs with in-memory data structures
If it is singleton data the I suppose you could keep a static pointer to the
data structure, a static "use" counter, and a static mutex.
Then, for each connection (xConnect), lock the mutex, if
linglists.sqlite.org]
> On Behalf Of Dimitris Bil
> Sent: Monday, 3 July, 2017 11:14
> To: sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
> Subject: [sqlite] Concurrent reads for VTs with in-memory data structures
>
> I have some virtual tables that keep in-memory data structures. Data
&
I have some virtual tables that keep in-memory data structures. Data loading is
happening at table creation (xCreate and xConnect are the same) and after that,
during querying, only read access is needed. Queries do not access any other
tables. Is there a way to achieve concurrent execution
6 matches
Mail list logo
