Re: [sqlite] Could/should Windows build of SQLite use #define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN?

2012-03-23 Thread Larry Brasfield
On March 23, Jeff Robbins wrote: When building using the SQLite amalgamation, I noticed Windows.h being included without #define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN. This includes a lot of extraneous "cruft". Any reason not to trim down the windows build this way? There is no real reason not to do that. F

Re: [sqlite] Could/should Windows build of SQLite use #define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN?

2012-03-23 Thread Teg
Hello Jeff, Isn't that just a build time thing? Include fewer includes during the compile? I just don't build sqlite often enough to seem to think this matters. Pretty sure this has no impact on the ultimate size of the code generated. Friday, March 23, 2012, 7:51:36 AM, you wrote: JR> Wh

[sqlite] Could/should Windows build of SQLite use #define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN?

2012-03-23 Thread Jeff Robbins
When building using the SQLite amalgamation, I noticed Windows.h being included without #define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN. This includes a lot of extraneous "cruft". Any reason not to trim down the windows build this way? ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlit