> >> Does
> >> using separate databases and attaching them improve concurrency (by
> >> providing finer-grained locking)?
> >
> > Yes it does. You can open a connection to a memory database, store each
> table
> > in a separate database and attach them if needed. I'v already changed
> > sqlite
Eduardo Morras uttered:
At 19:32 01/06/2007, you wrote:
When you have a connection with multiple attached databases and the
connection acquires an exclusive lock, does it always lock all attached
databases or does it keep track of which databases require the lock? Does
using separate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
When you have a connection with multiple attached databases and the
connection acquires an exclusive lock, does it always lock all attached
databases or does it keep track of which databases require the lock?
1st process:
C:\Documents and
At 19:32 01/06/2007, you wrote:
>When you have a connection with multiple attached databases and the
>connection acquires an exclusive lock, does it always lock all attached
>databases or does it keep track of which databases require the lock? Does
>using separate databases and attaching them
When you have a connection with multiple attached databases and the
connection acquires an exclusive lock, does it always lock all attached
databases or does it keep track of which databases require the lock? Does
using separate databases and attaching them improve concurrency (by
providing
5 matches
Mail list logo
