Thanks to both Scott and Dan for your answers!
Ralf
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
On Mar 3, 2010, at 6:26 PM, Ralf Junker wrote:
> The recent changes to FTS3 fixed a long standing problem with MATCH
> and
> AND operators combined. Take this schema:
>
> drop table if exists myfts;
> create virtual table myfts using fts3 (a);
> insert into myfts values ('one');
> insert into m
I can't speak to the question of whether it's a real problem, but I
bet you can work around with a sub-select. Something like:
select * from myfts where rowid = 1 OR rowid IN (select rowid from
myfts where (myfts MATCH 'one'));
-scott
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:26 AM, Ralf Junker wrote:
> The r
The recent changes to FTS3 fixed a long standing problem with MATCH and
AND operators combined. Take this schema:
drop table if exists myfts;
create virtual table myfts using fts3 (a);
insert into myfts values ('one');
insert into myfts values ('two');
This following query produced an "unable to
4 matches
Mail list logo