sqlite3_blob_reopen.ppt
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
On 17/02/12 14:51, Frank Chang wrote:
I ran some tests today and found that sqlite3_blob_reopen is significantly
faster than sqlite3_blob_open.
Have you read the documentation?
http://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/blob_reopen.html
sqlite3_blob_reopen only works when you already have a blob handle
Roger Binns, I ran some tests today and found that sqlite3_blob_reopen is
significantly faster than sqlite3_blob_open. Attached is the Very Sleepy Full
Profiler report. The modified C++ code is shown below. Thank you.
unsigned long *cIntersectingDedupe::GetSubGraphBlob(sSUBGRAPHINFO
On 17/02/12 05:09, Frank Chang wrote:
Is it possible to find a faster alternative to sqlite3_blob_open?
sqlite3_blob_open is the fast alternative! However you are reading the
entire blob contents so it won't be that different than just using a regular
SQL query.
Also whatever you are
Good morning,We have been using sqlite3_blob_open in the function below.When I
profile the application using Very Sleepy I notice that sqlite3_blob_open is
one of he biggest consumers of CPU time. Is it possible to find a faster
alternative to sqlite3_blob_open? Thank you
unsigned long
5 matches
Mail list logo