ame,get next column value for that name for x times. instead I get
> values into tuple in one call.
>
> -Raji
>
> --- On Thu, 5/21/09, Pavel Ivanov <paiva...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Pavel Ivanov <paiva...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Fw: Ques
ll. Want to guess how it works?
Function calls in and of themselves aren't that expensive.
-j
> --- On Thu, 5/21/09, Pavel Ivanov <paiva...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Pavel Ivanov <paiva...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Fw: Question about read
>
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Fw: Question about reading all database data into memory
To: "General Discussion of SQLite Database" <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 11:33 AM
Why do you expect performance improvement in your approach as opposed
to implemented now?
Why do you expect performance improvement in your approach as opposed
to implemented now?
Pavel
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:56 PM, rajyalakshmi bommaraju
wrote:
> I did not get any reply so adding bit more explanation for what I need.
>
> In a C program, I am trying to read
I did not get any reply so adding bit more explanation for what I need.
In a C program, I am trying to read data from database. I use
sqlite3_prepare_v2 to execute "Select * from abc", sqlite3_step to get a row,
and sqlite3_col_name,sqlite3_col_val to get column values. I read columns one
by
5 matches
Mail list logo