Thanks for the response, Richard.
I took a look through main.c, pager.c and os.c and do not see anything
that may have caused such behavior. I have tried repeatedly to
reproduce the phenomenon and have not been successful (which is good).
Looks like I must have had some other issue around the
I guess what I'm really asking is - are there any circumstances under which
SQLite 2.8.14 writes to common (shared among all threads) data structures,
either in memory or on disk, during a call to sqlite_close() ?
Not that I know of. But I might have missed something. Why don't you
check the sour
Kurt Welgehausen wrote:
Perhaps,
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg02334.html
Regards
Thanks for the response, however it does not quite fit in with what I saw.
I guess what I'm really asking is - are there any circumstances under which
SQLite 2.8.14 writes to common (shared am
Perhaps,
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg02334.html
Regards
I have a multithreaded application using SQLite 2.8.14. I fully understand, and
have implemented, the requirement that each thread make its own call to
sqlite_open() to obtain a unique handle to the database. I am using a thread
synchronization scheme external to SQLite that has been fully tested
5 matches
Mail list logo