Re: [sqlite] Mac OS X, Readline 5.0, and SQLite

2004-11-06 Thread b.bum
On Nov 6, 2004, at 10:48 AM, Jeff Flowers wrote: There has to it than just being under the GPL. After all, Emacs and other GLPed software is included in Mac OS X. Maybe it is to prevent people from accidently mixing GPLed and non-GPLed code? There isn't any GPL'd software on the baseline user insta

Re: [sqlite] Mac OS X, Readline 5.0, and SQLite

2004-11-06 Thread Jeff Flowers
>> So, Fink is no longer needed just for Readline if you have the >> Developer Tools installed. :) > > That has always been the case -- Fink has never been needed. Readline 4.x did not compile straight out of the tarball. The source code needed a small modification, as documented on the SQLite W

Re: [sqlite] Mac OS X, Readline 5.0, and SQLite

2004-11-06 Thread b.bum
On Nov 6, 2004, at 7:24 AM, Jeff Flowers wrote: I don't know if this is already known but for any Mac OS X 10.3 users, I wanted to mention that Readline 5.0 now compiles out of the tarball, using the normal "configure,make,make install" commands. I just verified this for myself by building Readli

[sqlite] Mac OS X, Readline 5.0, and SQLite

2004-11-06 Thread Jeff Flowers
I don't know if this is already known but for any Mac OS X 10.3 users, I wanted to mention that Readline 5.0 now compiles out of the tarball, using the normal "configure,make,make install" commands. I just verified this for myself by building Readline 5.0 and SQLite 3.0.8 on my PowerMac G4. I have