On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Eleytherios Stamatogiannakis <
est...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for the answer as well as the merge-join complexity remark. What
> about the union-all with ordered input and an order-by on the whole query?
> Does SQLite use a "merge" algorithm for that case?
>
Thank you for the answer as well as the merge-join complexity remark.
What about the union-all with ordered input and an order-by on the whole
query? Does SQLite use a "merge" algorithm for that case?
Kind regards,
l.
On 26/06/14 21:45, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:41 AM
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Eleytherios Stamatogiannakis <
est...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen that SQLite supports the "SorterOpen" Op, to do merge sorting.
> So based on that, does SQLite support merge joins when both inputs of the
> join are sorted?
>
No, not at this time. Note
Hi,
I've seen that SQLite supports the "SorterOpen" Op, to do merge sorting.
So based on that, does SQLite support merge joins when both inputs of
the join are sorted?
Kind regards,
l.
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sq
4 matches
Mail list logo