Re: [sqlite] Network Storage

On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:54:39 +0100 Richard Schülein wrote: > So that means, if there is only 1 machine accessing the network database, > there should be no problem with the network access and the locking? I ended using only one sqlite full accessing the db. All others submit

Re: [sqlite] Network Storage

. Februar 2014 13:28 An: General Discussion of SQLite Database Betreff: Re: [sqlite] Network Storage On 24 Feb 2014, at 12:07pm, Richard Schülein <r...@noveltech.de> wrote: > Is there anything needed to store the Database itself on a shared > network devices? In my opinion this is simil

Re: [sqlite] Network Storage

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Simon Slavin wrote: > So single-user single-process use of a database, without hardware faults > or power faults, should not present a problem. > Minor addenda/caveat: i have seen NFS-based systems which slow down (by 100x or more) apps

Re: [sqlite] Network Storage

On 24 Feb 2014, at 12:07pm, Richard Schülein wrote: > Is there anything needed to store the Database itself on a shared network > devices? In my opinion this is similar to an USB drive etc. That means, that > the drive don’t even know, where the database is stored. Or is

Re: [sqlite] Network Storage

you provide for the database file. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Richard Schülein [mailto:r...@noveltech.de] Gesendet: Montag, 24. Februar 2014 13:08 An: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Betreff: [sqlite] Network Storage Hi, i have an general question regarding SQLite and Network. As I can read

[sqlite] Network Storage

Hi, i have an general question regarding SQLite and Network. As I can read here http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=SqliteNetwork there can be problems with that…. Do anybody have experience on that. We use SQLLite on an embedded Linuxsystem on an Audioserver which store his files on local