Thank you for your responses.
I was hoping for an easy hardware solution, like more memory or a faster HD
. but it looks like indices and table design are where I need to focus.
peterK
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:08:48 -0400
"peter korinis" wrote:
> This question regards SQLite (3.6) performance. (Lengthy because I want to
> describe the environment.)
>
> . Win-7 (64-bit, though I don't know if SQLite uses 64-bit).
>
> . 3 year old HP
On 29 Apr 2013, at 4:08pm, peter korinis wrote:
Thanks for your detailed description of your use of SQLite which saved a lot of
questions.
> 1. Is my current DB too large for SQLite to handle efficiently? I just
> read in O'Reilly, Using SQLite, book, "If you need
This question regards SQLite (3.6) performance. (Lengthy because I want to
describe the environment.)
. Win-7 (64-bit, though I don't know if SQLite uses 64-bit).
. 3 year old HP laptop with Intel Core Duo CPU P8400 @ 2.27GHz with
only 4GB memory
. 286GB HD (50% full) +
4 matches
Mail list logo