[sqlite] Re: DB design questions

2007-04-21 Thread A. Pagaltzis
Hi Michael, * Michael Ruck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-21 22:35]: > Thanks for your response. Do you have a recommendation for a > simpler data store, which supports only simple queries (like, > equals, not equals on attributes) and transactions? BerkeleyDB might be a candidate. It only stores

AW: [sqlite] Re: DB design questions

2007-04-21 Thread Michael Ruck
2007 21:17 An: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Betreff: [sqlite] Re: DB design questions * Michael Ruck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-20 16:15]: > Is there anyone who has experience with this kind of design, do you > have better ideas on modelling this kind of data? This is actually a

[sqlite] Re: DB design questions

2007-04-21 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Michael Ruck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-20 16:15]: > Is there anyone who has experience with this kind of design, do > you have better ideas on modelling this kind of data? This is actually a very typical approach to storing arbitrarily structured data entities in an SQL database that