Ok,
Thanks.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Teg wrote:
> Hello Charles,
>
> Tuesday, May 13, 2014, 3:12:09 PM, you wrote:
>
> CS> Load it with sqlite3_value_int64 every time. If the number fits in a 32
> bit
> CS> integer, then you can store it in one.
>
> This is what I do. Everything is 64 b
Hello Charles,
Tuesday, May 13, 2014, 3:12:09 PM, you wrote:
CS> Load it with sqlite3_value_int64 every time. If the number fits in a 32 bit
CS> integer, then you can store it in one.
This is what I do. Everything is 64 bits to be future proof.
CS> Charles
CS>
On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 12:02:27 PM gwenn wrote:
> Is there any way to differentiate one value persisted with
> sqlite3_bind_int from another persisted with sqlite3_bind_int64 ?
No, there's no difference
> How to know which method between sqlite3_value_int and
> sqlite3_value_int64 should be use
Hello,
Is there any way to differentiate one value persisted with
sqlite3_bind_int from another persisted with sqlite3_bind_int64 ?
How to know which method between sqlite3_value_int and
sqlite3_value_int64 should be used to retrieve the value back ?
Regards.
___
4 matches
Mail list logo