On 11 May 2017, at 23:35, Simon Slavin wrote:
> It’s the word 'remote' which is not clearly explained. In the SQLite
> documentation, the word 'remote' means you’re accessing it using a networking
> API not a file system API. It’s the network storage APIs which tend to do
> locking badly.
Loca
On 11 May 2017, at 4:12pm, Bill Wade wrote:
> I'd say that "local file system" versus "remote file system" is really more
> of a shorthand for the requirement that low-level operations such as locks
> and reads behave the way that sqlite expects them to behave.
>
>
>
> In particular, locks on
om]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 17:06
>> To: SQLite mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [sqlite] SQLite DB on external USB HD - is it safe?
>> ...
>> If Windows reports that the filesystem is "local" then it is OK.
>> ...
_
OK, thanks for the detailed analysis! :-)
Am Tue, 09 May 2017 16:06:28 -0600 schrieb Keith Medcalf:
[...]
> If Windows reports that the filesystem is "local" then it is OK. If
> Windows reports that the filesystem is "remote", then it is ungood. A
> "drive mapped to the local computer" is a
On Tuesday, 9 May, 2017 15:02, Wolfgang Enzinger enquired,
> since it's wise to store SQLite databases on local HDs (as opposed to
> network filesystems) in order to avoid corruption,
As long as you understand what a "network filesysem" is. A "network
filesystem" is a filesystem that is remo
Dear group members,
since it's wise to store SQLite databases on local HDs (as opposed to
network filesystems) in order to avoid corruption, I would like to have my
program check if this requirement is fulfilled. I'm on Windows so I use
GetDriveType() for testing the DB path. Now I noticed that th
6 matches
Mail list logo
