>I have heard problems with SQLite and NFS but I have no idea if a standard
>Windows shared drive uses NFS or not. Am I o.k. to use SQLite???
It's ok for low intensity uses. You'll get "database locked" errors
if there is too much contention for the database.
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Slavin wrote:
> Standard Windows drive sharing uses SMB, sometimes called SAMBA.
SMB stands for Server Message Block - the name of the protocol as originally
developed by IBM in 1982. The protocol is extensible in that a dialect is
negotiated u
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:47:33 -0400, mark m
wrote:
>I have heard problems with SQLite and NFS but I have no idea if a standard
>Windows shared drive uses NFS or not. Am I o.k. to use SQLite???
http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=SqliteNetwork
___
sqli
On 30 Oct 2009, at 5:47am, mark m wrote:
> I have heard problems with SQLite and NFS but I have no idea if a
> standard
> Windows shared drive uses NFS or not. Am I o.k. to use SQLite???
Standard Windows drive sharing uses SMB, sometimes called SAMBA. NFS
is not involved.
Simon.
_
I am interested in using SQLite for my business management program which is
currently using text files to store all data. I have Windows XP and 3 PC's
access my data files through a shared drive (Windows file sharing).
I have heard problems with SQLite and NFS but I have no idea if a standard
Win
5 matches
Mail list logo