Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]
On Behalf Of Dan Kennedy
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 9:08 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] TestFixture 3.7.2 - Some WAL tests fail on QNX OS
On Oct 15, 2010, at 10:24 PM
I also see where you can set the behavior using procnto -- I'll bet "procnto
~i" will make sqlite behave correctly. Though this is a global change.
Anybody who depends on this zeroing though is nuts...
http://www.qnx.com/developers/docs/6.4.0/neutrino/lib_ref/m/munmap_flags.html
There are
. Black
> Senior Scientist
> Advanced Analytics Directorate
> Northrop Grumman Information Systems
>
>
>
>
> From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org on behalf of Raj, Praveen
> Sent: Fri 10/15/2010 9:55 AM
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
> Subject: EXTE
gt; Northrop Grumman Information Systems
>
>
>
>
> From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org on behalf of Raj, Praveen
> Sent: Fri 10/15/2010 9:55 AM
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
> Subject: EXTERNAL:Re: [sqlite] TestFixture 3.7.2 -
j, Praveen
Sent: Fri 10/15/2010 9:55 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: EXTERNAL:Re: [sqlite] TestFixture 3.7.2 - Some WAL tests fail on QNX OS
Hi Michael,
Yes I added the "MAP_NOINIT" to mmap() and "UNMAP_INIT_OPTIONAL" flag to
munmap_flags() call.
to:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]
On Behalf Of Black, Michael (IS)
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 9:22 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] TestFixture 3.7.2 - Some WAL tests fail on QNX OS
Did you also add the MAP_NOINIT to the mmap() call?
It sounds like exact
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org on behalf of Raj, Praveen
Sent: Thu 10/14/2010 10:44 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: EXTERNAL:Re: [sqlite] TestFixture 3.7.2 - Some WAL tests fail on QNX OS
Hi Micheal,
Thanks Dan and Michael for all your inputs.
I tried
lto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]
On Behalf Of Black, Michael (IS)
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 5:21 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] TestFixture 3.7.2 - Some WAL tests fail on QNX OS
I sent this before...have you tried this?
According to the QNX mmap
behalf of Raj, Praveen
Sent: Thu 10/14/2010 5:53 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: EXTERNAL:Re: [sqlite] TestFixture 3.7.2 - Some WAL tests fail on QNX OS
Hi Dan,
I did some more investigation on the issue and i feel there is synchronization
problem happening here.
After mm
raveen
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
> ] On Behalf Of Dan Kennedy
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 9:33 PM
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] TestFixture 3.7.2 - S
base
Subject: Re: [sqlite] TestFixture 3.7.2 - Some WAL tests fail on QNX OS
On Oct 8, 2010, at 9:44 PM, Raj, Praveen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I debugged the SQLite functions and here is my finding:
>
> The call to "mmap" in the function "unixShmMap" is causing the is
On Oct 8, 2010, at 9:44 PM, Raj, Praveen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I debugged the SQLite functions and here is my finding:
>
> The call to "mmap" in the function "unixShmMap" is causing the issue.
> void *pMem = mmap(0, szRegion, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
> MAP_SHARED, pShmNode->h,
Directorate
Northrop Grumman Information Systems
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org on behalf of Raj, Praveen
Sent: Fri 10/8/2010 9:44 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: EXTERNAL:Re: [sqlite] TestFixture 3.7.2 - Some WAL tests fail on QNX OS
Kennedy
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 7:37 PM
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] TestFixture 3.7.2 - Some WAL tests fail on QNX
> OS
>
>
> On Oct 6, 2010, at 8:15 PM, Raj, Praveen wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm new to SQLi
nesday, October 06, 2010 7:37 PM
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] TestFixture 3.7.2 - Some WAL tests fail on QNX
> OS
>
>
> On Oct 6, 2010, at 8:15 PM, Raj, Praveen wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm new to SQLite, so not s
nnedy
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 7:37 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] TestFixture 3.7.2 - Some WAL tests fail on QNX OS
On Oct 6, 2010, at 8:15 PM, Raj, Praveen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm new to SQLite, so not sure what is the behavior of these fai
ilto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
> ] On Behalf Of Raj, Praveen
> Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 7:42 PM
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] TestFixture 3.7.2 - Some WAL tests fail on QNX
> OS
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes the files sizes of &q
7:42 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] TestFixture 3.7.2 - Some WAL tests fail on QNX OS
Hi,
Yes the files sizes of "test.db", "test.db-wal" and "test.db-shm" are 1024,
4333512 and 65536 bytes respectively as specified below.
Most o
of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] TestFixture 3.7.2 - Some WAL tests fail on QNX OS
On Oct 1, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Raj, Praveen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm validating SQLite test suite version 3.7.2 on QNX operating
> system. I have built the testfixture using SQLite amalgation file
> and other
On Oct 1, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Raj, Praveen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm validating SQLite test suite version 3.7.2 on QNX operating
> system. I have built the testfixture using SQLite amalgation file
> and other related files/libraries.
>
> I ran the full test suite and most of the test cases are
Hi,
I'm validating SQLite test suite version 3.7.2 on QNX operating system. I have
built the testfixture using SQLite amalgation file and other related
files/libraries.
I ran the full test suite and most of the test cases are passing, except some
run in journal_mode = WAL. Test cases whose
21 matches
Mail list logo
