On 2016/01/24 10:15 PM, audio muze wrote:
> I have a large table with ~350k records for which I'm in the process of
> standardising data.
350k records is not exactly a "large" table, A table scan would complete
in a couple of seconds on a normal system. 350 million rows are more
substantial
anyone?
I have a large table with ~350k records for which I'm in the process of
standardising data. The fields I'm most interested in standardising are
albumartist, artist, performer and composer. I'm dealing with one at a
time and the logic for each is the same. I'll state in advance that I'm a
SQL
3 matches
Mail list logo