Re: [sqlite] Version 3.7.0 delayed. Was: no longer able to use read-only databases?

2010-07-12 Thread Simon Slavin
On 12 Jul 2010, at 8:42pm, Noah Hart wrote: > consider that if you embed the WAL within the SQLite > database itself, past the high-water mark, it would also take case of this > problem. No. Because whichever file stores the WAL information is stored in has to be opened with read/write permiss

Re: [sqlite] Version 3.7.0 delayed. Was: no longer able to use read-only databases?

2010-07-12 Thread Noah Hart
Richard, In thinking about this, consider that if you embed the WAL within the SQLite database itself, past the high-water mark, it would also take case of this problem. Noah Hart On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Matthew L. Creech wrote: > In testing the latest SQLite snapshot with WAL enable

[sqlite] Version 3.7.0 delayed. Was: no longer able to use read-only databases?

2010-07-12 Thread Richard Hipp
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Matthew L. Creech wrote: > In testing the latest SQLite snapshot with WAL enabled, it seems that > there's no way to use a database in a read-only location. > The release of SQLite version 3.7.0 will likely be delayed while we try to figure out how to deal with thi