[sqlite] X64

2018-09-17 Thread Evert van Dijken
Is there no new X64 version? -- With kind regards, Evert van Dijken De Hazelaar 5 6921XA Duiven (NL). --- Deze e-mail is gecontroleerd op virussen door AVG. http://www.avg.com ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org

Re: [sqlite] x64 binary

2016-06-29 Thread Noel Frankinet
Not really an answer, but it's easier to compile directly the source of sqlite with your files. Only one .c file, no dependency, no 32 or 64 bit problem, no installation problem. Best wishes. Noël On 29 June 2016 at 01:05, BOSECKER Nancy wrote: > Hi, > > I have a very

[sqlite] x64 binary

2016-06-28 Thread BOSECKER Nancy
Hi, I have a very basic problem, maybe someone can help. I'm trying to use sqlite3.dll in an x64 application (VS 2008). So, I downloaded the x64 zip from the SQLite download page, unzipped it. I put the .dll, .lib, and .def files in my project's directory. I added the .lib to the Linker->Input

Re: [sqlite] x64 vs x32 DLL

2014-11-04 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 4, 2014, at 5:25 PM, Keith Medcalf wrote: > Assuming that you do rebuild the entire application as 64-bit, it will > consume at least twice the amount of memory as the x86 version and run slower > in user code. [citation needed] On 32-bit Cygwin: $ ls -lh `which

Re: [sqlite] x64 vs x32 DLL

2014-11-04 Thread Keith Medcalf
On Tuesday, 4 November, 2014 12:35, jose isaias cabrera asked: >I have an application that is written for x32 machines. However, we now >have a few machines that are x64 and all is well when we are using the >precompiled x32 DLLs provided by

Re: [sqlite] x64 vs x32 DLL

2014-11-04 Thread James K. Lowden
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 22:20:23 +0200 RSmith wrote: > The best way to think of the 64 bit upgrade in normal programming is: > "Able to do larger accuracy calculations at more or less the same > speed". Eh, more accurate how? Every 32-architecture I compiled for supported

Re: [sqlite] x64 vs x32 DLL

2014-11-04 Thread David Woodhouse
> > On 2014/11/04 21:34, jose isaias cabrera wrote: >> Greetings! >> >> I have an application that is written for x32 machines. However, we now >> have a few machines that are x64 and all is well when we are using the >> precompiled x32 DLLs provided by http://www.sqlite.org/download.html. >>

Re: [sqlite] x64 vs x32 DLL

2014-11-04 Thread jose isaias cabrera
"Stephan Beal" wrote... On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:20 PM, RSmith wrote: miniscule. On the downside, a 64-bit system uses 64 bit values for all registers even where 32-bit values could have sufficed, and so all internal looping through bits or register shifts take

Re: [sqlite] x64 vs x32 DLL

2014-11-04 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:20 PM, RSmith wrote: > miniscule. On the downside, a 64-bit system uses 64 bit values for all > registers even where 32-bit values could have sufficed, and so all internal > looping through bits or register shifts take longer, but generally by >

Re: [sqlite] x64 vs x32 DLL

2014-11-04 Thread RSmith
On 2014/11/04 21:34, jose isaias cabrera wrote: Greetings! I have an application that is written for x32 machines. However, we now have a few machines that are x64 and all is well when we are using the precompiled x32 DLLs provided by http://www.sqlite.org/download.html. Changing the x32

[sqlite] x64 vs x32 DLL

2014-11-04 Thread jose isaias cabrera
Greetings! I have an application that is written for x32 machines. However, we now have a few machines that are x64 and all is well when we are using the precompiled x32 DLLs provided by http://www.sqlite.org/download.html. Changing the x32 DLLs to x64 DLLs, will it show any difference in