Is there no new X64 version?
--
With kind regards,
Evert van Dijken
De Hazelaar 5
6921XA Duiven (NL).
---
Deze e-mail is gecontroleerd op virussen door AVG.
http://www.avg.com
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
Not really an answer, but it's easier to compile directly the source of
sqlite with your files. Only one .c file, no dependency, no 32 or 64 bit
problem, no installation problem.
Best wishes.
Noël
On 29 June 2016 at 01:05, BOSECKER Nancy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a very
Hi,
I have a very basic problem, maybe someone can help.
I'm trying to use sqlite3.dll in an x64 application (VS 2008).
So, I downloaded the x64 zip from the SQLite download page, unzipped it.
I put the .dll, .lib, and .def files in my project's directory.
I added the .lib to the Linker->Input
On Nov 4, 2014, at 5:25 PM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
> Assuming that you do rebuild the entire application as 64-bit, it will
> consume at least twice the amount of memory as the x86 version and run slower
> in user code.
[citation needed]
On 32-bit Cygwin:
$ ls -lh `which
On Tuesday, 4 November, 2014 12:35, jose isaias cabrera
asked:
>I have an application that is written for x32 machines. However, we now
>have a few machines that are x64 and all is well when we are using the
>precompiled x32 DLLs provided by
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 22:20:23 +0200
RSmith wrote:
> The best way to think of the 64 bit upgrade in normal programming is:
> "Able to do larger accuracy calculations at more or less the same
> speed".
Eh, more accurate how? Every 32-architecture I compiled for supported
>
> On 2014/11/04 21:34, jose isaias cabrera wrote:
>> Greetings!
>>
>> I have an application that is written for x32 machines. However, we now
>> have a few machines that are x64 and all is well when we are using the
>> precompiled x32 DLLs provided by http://www.sqlite.org/download.html.
>>
"Stephan Beal" wrote...
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:20 PM, RSmith wrote:
miniscule. On the downside, a 64-bit system uses 64 bit values for all
registers even where 32-bit values could have sufficed, and so all
internal
looping through bits or register shifts take
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:20 PM, RSmith wrote:
> miniscule. On the downside, a 64-bit system uses 64 bit values for all
> registers even where 32-bit values could have sufficed, and so all internal
> looping through bits or register shifts take longer, but generally by
>
On 2014/11/04 21:34, jose isaias cabrera wrote:
Greetings!
I have an application that is written for x32 machines. However, we now have a
few machines that are x64 and all is well when we are using the precompiled x32
DLLs provided by http://www.sqlite.org/download.html. Changing the x32
Greetings!
I have an application that is written for x32 machines. However, we now have a
few machines that are x64 and all is well when we are using the precompiled x32
DLLs provided by http://www.sqlite.org/download.html. Changing the x32 DLLs to
x64 DLLs, will it show any difference in
11 matches
Mail list logo